Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week: ChatGPT Edition


For those readers that have not followed the news/events that have been unfolding in recent weeks in regard to ChatGPT, let us take a step back.  ChatGPT is an AI chat bot that generates human like text based upon input.  Notably, ChatGPT has passed bar exams, college exams, medical licensing exams, and related testing as well as being able to code, send emails, and producing advertising and press releases.  In doing so, many have attempted to use ChatGPT to simulate work and related projects in the workplace.  Given this sudden rise in popularity (amongst some) with this AI, I think this is a good time to look at how ChatGPT is impacting the workforce in employment related matters.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


ChatGPT & HIPPA Compliance Issues

Ah yes, the situation that likely keeps many in the HR field up at night:  the disclosure of an employee’s medical history/records.  As this article notes, there is concern that while ChatGPT could take over many of the responsibilities of those in HR, at this time there does not appear to be a way to prevent the AI system from disclosing an employee’s medical records.  Many have pointed out that while ChatGPT (and related AI systems) can streamline the process, these AI systems are not full proof.  In this instance, while ChatGPT apparently could be used to ensure compliance with HIPPA, it does not appear the system is capable of handling/processing an employee’s records without disclosing an employee’s medical history.


How ChatGPT Can be Utilized By Those in HR

While many may consider ChatGPT to be an “enemy”, in so much that it could replace employees/jobs, let us consider how it could be utilized by those in the HR field. As Allie Nawrat over at Unleash writes, some in the HR field are finding ways to utilize ChatGPT (and related AI system) to help write job postings, market the employer, and write about positions/careers on the employer’s website.  Now will these AI system replace everything that those in the HR field do?  Not necessarily.  However, there does appear to be room to integrate these systems into the HR field.


Tech Companies Warn Employees Against Sharing Sensitive Data With ChatGPT

In recent days, some big tech companies like Microsoft and Amazon have cautioned their employees against sharing sensitive data with ChatGPT.  It is important to note that these tech companies have generally supported the use and integration of ChatGPT into their work places.  However, there is still some uncertainty as to how/when, and how often ChatGPT should be utilized in the workplace.  As well, there appears to be some apprehension over what ChatGPT could do with sensitive data if it is shared with the AI system by employees.  At this time, while their appears to be no perfect answer/solution to the matter, I expect to see employers begin to implement policies over how/the manner in which these AI systems are used in the workplace. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more