Skip to main content

New Jersey Senate Passes Temporary Worker Bill of Rights


Last Thursday, the New Jersey Senate voted 21 - 16 in favor of passage of S511, the Temporary Worker Bill of Rights.

Advocates of the legislation had long championed it as vital to workers in the state, despite fierce opposition from business groups.  Business groups criticized the legislation over claims it would unnecessarily drive up costs and force companies to move out of the state.

As for the key portions of the legislation itself, S511 provides temporary workers in the state with the right to basic information in English and their native language in regard to where they will be working, their pay rate, their work schedule, the type of work they will be performing, and how much sick leave they would be entitled to receive.

S511 further eliminates many of the fees that temp agencies deduct from workers’ pay, including mandatory fees for things such as vans which shuttle workers to their job sites.

In addition, temporary workers would be guaranteed to earn at least the minimum wage rate after fees are deducted from their paychecks by a temp agency.  Temp agencies would be required to pay these temporary workers the same as a full time worker.

Notably, a vote on S511 had been delayed three times with Democrats in the Senate not having enough support to pass the legislation.  While Governor Phil Murphy had previously vetoed a version of this legislation, it is expected he will sign off on the bill when it reaches his desk.


For a copy of S511:  https://www.njleg.state.nj.us/bill-search/2022/S511

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more