Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


Some time on the road for work this week left me with only a little time to read through articles   Nevertheless, I did come across a coupe worth highlighting   Heading into Election Day next week (with several employment and labor law related measures on the ballot) will be something to keep an eye on in the coming days. 

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


The Minimum Number of Hours Needed Per Week to Afford Rent

Molly Schiff recently published an article in which she examined how many hours per week an hourly worker would need to work to afford rent on a one bedroom apartment.  Of course, it would be exhaustive (let alone nearly impossible) to crunch the numbers for a worker in every city in America, Schiff pulls a few key findings from NYC (111 hours/week), Chicago (112 hours/week), Phoenix (65 hours/week), and Dallas (120 hours/week), amongst others.  I encourage readers to page through Schiff’s findings to get a sense of where it is (and is not) affordable to live on a minimum wage salary.


Beginning January 1st: Chicago to Provide 12 Weeks of Paid Parental Leave to City Workers

Watch out, San Diego, Chicago is one step ahead of you.  Readers will likely recall that a proposal was recently made by a San Diego Councilmember to provide workers in the city with twelve weeks of paid parental leave.  While that proposal is debated back and forth, Chicago recently announced that it had reached an agreement with a union representing city employees that will provide city workers with twelve weeks of paid parental leave.  Notably, this paid leave applies to both the birth and non-birthing parent.  Will San Diego be the next city to adopt a similar paid leave measure?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more