Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


I came across two good articles this week that should give readers something to page through over the weekend.  While I do call attention to the article on Starbucks, I refer readers to the second article which traces the history of right to work laws in the country.  I encourage readers to spend the time paging through that article to get a better insight into the topic.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.



Readers recall that the spread of unions at nearly 100 Starbucks locations around the country has become a major thorn in the side of Starbucks and anti union supporters.  As Caitlin Harrington over at Wired recently noted, before Starbucks workers had a union, they had a platform called “Coworker” that gave them a voice to try and fight for changes in the workplace.  This platform took center stage when Starbucks workers fought for the right to roll up their sleeves to expose tattoos (with visible tattoos having been a no go with Starbucks.)  Since the time the platform launched in 2013, it has been utilized as a tool to use petitions to bring about change in the workplace.  With the rise of unions at Starbucks, the creators of Coworker are now looking at ways to incorporate these online petitions to further a pro union and worker friendly message at the company.



Ah yes, right to work laws…a bane to labor unions around the country.  For those unfamiliar with right to work laws, states that have these laws in place prohibit the requirement that a worker join a union or pay union dues as a condition of employment.  With Democrats having majority control in Congress, they are attempting to pass the PRO Act, legislation which would roll back right to work laws, among other labor friendly initiatives.  This is as good of a time as any to provide a bit of background on right to work laws and how they have evolved over the decades.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more