Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


For those looking for Elon Musk news, you are in luck!  No, I am not talking about his proposed acquisition of Twitter or the will he/won’t he take SpaceX public debate.  Rather, for purposes of this post, I wanted to highlight his recent announcement as it pertains to Tesla workers working remotely.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Tesla Moves to Bring All Workers Back to the Office

Kara Carlson over at The Austin American-Statesman reported on Wednesday that Tesla has recently instructed its employees to make plans to return to the office full time or work for a different employer.  This is a somewhat odd decision for Tesla to make, given that many employers (including those in tech) have either allowed employees to continue work remote for the foreseeable future or have enacted some sort of hybrid setup.  Tesla has chosen to go the opposite direction by requiring its workers to be in a Tesla office for at least 40 hours per week.  The directive, which came from Elon Musk, is apparently aimed at keeping employees engaged as Musk himself has stated that Tesla would have not bankrupt if he had not been a visible presence in the workplace. 


Third Circuit Holds “Back to the Salt Mine” Comment Does NOT Violate Employees’ Labor Rights

On May 20th, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals considered whether the head of the Federalist, a media company, violated employees’ labor rights by jokingly tweeting to send employees “back to the sale mine” if they formed a union.  I refer readers to the full opinion for a more in depth discussion but in relevant part, the Court overruled the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) and held that no labor rights were violated because the NLRB did not consider the context in which the comment were made as well as how the employees received the comment.  There is a lot to unpack in the opinion and one I would suggest readers review when they have a minute.


White House Interns to Be Paid Beginning Fall 2022

As reported by The Washington Post, this fall, interns at the White House will begin to be paid - $750 at the outset of the internship and an additional $750 at the end of the internship.  For those interns that do not complete the 14 week internship, they will be expected to repay an amount equal to the uncompleted time.  This apparently will mark the first time in decades that White House interns will be paid.  Notably, there will be no relocation or living expenses provided. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more