Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week: HR Edition


In recent weeks, we have had a post dedicated to labor law and minimum wage developments.  I suppose it is only appropriate that we dedicate this post to human resource related issues.  As the below articles point out, while burnout is an ongoing (and alarming) development in the Human Resources field, employer provided benefits continue to be a common situation many in Human Resources are dealing with as employers fight amongst themselves for a still small labor pool.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Human Resources Professionals Report 98% Burnout Rate

Ah yes, burnout in the workplace.  Even before the Great Resignation became a common phrase among workers and employers alike, burnout ran rampant in many industries.  As Jack Kelly at Forbes writes, with over 500 Human Resources professionals surveyed, a shocking 98% reported feeling burnout in their jobs.  As Kelly writes, the increasingly stressful workplace situations that many Human Resources professionals experienced (and continue to experience) following the impact the coronavirus has had in the workplace since 2020, has likely led to this high burnout rate.  Is there a “cure” for the burnout?  Unfortunately, there is likely not one simple solution to the matter.


Dollar General Announces Employer Paid Degree Program For Full Time Workers

On April 4th, Dollar General announced that it would offer its full time workers with a paid degree program at Strayer University or Capella University.  For those workers that want to obtain a degree elsewhere, Dollar General will offer a tuition reimbursement program to allow workers to get a degree somewhere besides Strayer or Capella.  Of course, some critics of this (and related paid degree programs) have argued that workers often do not know about these benefits and even if they are aware, do not have the time/ability to work full time and attend a university.  With that being said, criticism aside, this paid degree program is worth applauding.


Are Four Day Workweeks About to Become the Norm?

A recent study from Qualtrics found that approximately 92% of respondents wanted their employers to switch to a four day workweek.  While four day workweeks are common among some industries, I would not call it the norm by any stretch.  However, for many workers that have the option to do a four day workweek, they report a better work life balance and an increase in efficiency when working.  While I think some industries (in particular tech) might embrace a four day work week, I think it is going to be a long, hard slog to get a mass implementation of a four day work week.  However, I would love to be surprised to see this more commonly accepted across all industries!


Starbucks Weighs Implementing Better Benefits For Non Unionized Workers

In the ongoing battle at Starbucks amid its efforts to find ways to curb unionization efforts at the company, it has been reported that the company is considering implementing better benefits for workers that have not unionized and not applying those same benefits to unionized stores.  As Amelia Lucas at CNBC reports, Starbucks is considering using this offer of better benefits as a way to curb the onslaught of successful unionization votes over the past few months.  Whether it will actually be implemented (let alone effective in curbing unionization efforts) remains to be seen.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more