Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: SB 1044 (California)


As with many labor & employment law related cases (and bills) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


In mid February, SB 1044 was introduced in the California Senate by Democratic Senator Maria Durango.  The proposed legislation would enable employees to leave work or refuse to show up if the employee subjectively feels unsafe regardless of existing health and safety standards or whether the employer has provided health and safety precautions.  The legislation would also prohibit an employer from preventing any employee from accessing a mobile device (or other communication device) to seek emergency assistance, assessing the safety of the situation, or communicating with a person to confirm their safety.  

Note, this legislation would only apply when there is a “state of emergency”…such as Covid, in which California is still under a state of emergency.  While that particular state of emergency will (hopefully) end soon(ish) in California, it can (and likely will) be reinstated at some point down the road or some other situation will evolve that creates another state of emergency.  This is my way of suggesting that a state of emergency could potentially always exist in California such that employees could lawfully leave work or refuse to show up because of their belief that they would feel unsafe.

So under SB 1044, if an employee that does not feel safe because they are exposed to someone that is not vaccinated, not wearing a mask, is standing closer than 6 feet, etc., they could lawfully leave work and not be subjected to punishment by the employer…so long as a state of emergency exists.

As some readers might imagine, this could be a potentially chaotic situation given that SB 1044 does not provide a carve out for emergency workers such that a police officer, medic, firefighter, etc could choose to walk off the job because of a concern over their safety.  The consequences (and potential dangers) that could happen if these workers left the job are massive.

At this time, SB 1044 is still working its way through the California Senate.  Keep an eye on this one, if for no other reason that it is one of the most unique employment or labor law related bills I have seen in some time.


For additional information:  https://legiscan.com/CA/bill/SB1044/2021


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more