Skip to main content

Updated: Petition Withdrawn to Hold Election at New Jersey Amazon Warehouse


Ironically, on the same day I posted an article last week which noted that an election was set to be held at a New Jersey Amazon warehouse, the union that sought to hold the election withdrew its petition from the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”).

For a bit of background here, Local 713 of the International Brotherhood of Trade Unions had sought to unionize an Amazon warehouse in Bayonne, New Jersey.  In doing so, they had obtained 30% of signatures from eligible workers at the warehouse and filed their petition with the NLRB to have an election held.  While it appeared that the NLRB would set the election date, the union last week requested to withdraw its petition.  The NLRB indicated it would accept the withdrawal request and therefore no election will be held at this time. 

The timing of this withdrawal is a bit odd.  Give the momentum that workers suddenly have, in regard to unionization at places such as Starbucks, REI, and Amazon, now would be as good of a time as any to hold an election.  However, there were some rumblings about alleged unsavory ties that the union has which might have been grounds for the withdrawal of the petition.  These allegations only recently came to light which had started to pick up some unwanted media coverage.

What is next here?  Will another unionization push take place?  I suspect things will cool for a bit here but believe it is certainly possible (if not probable) that a renewed unionization effort is not far off at this Amazon warehouse.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

Happening Tomorrow: Connecticut’s Minimum Wage Increases

For those employers and employees alike in Connecticut, mark your calendars as tomorrow, the minimum wage rate increases in the state from $13/hour to $14/hour. This wage hike comes after Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont had signed Public Act 19-4 into law in 2019 which progressively raised the state’s hourly minimum wage rate every year for five years.  In fact, next year, the hourly wage rate will top out at $15/hour.  Beginning in January of 2024, the hourly wage rate will be indexed to the employment cost index. For additional information:   https://portal.ct.gov/Office-of-the-Governor/News/Press-Releases/2022/06-2022/Governor-Lamont-Reminds-Residents-That-Minimum-Wage-Is-Scheduled-To-Increase-on-Friday

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa