Skip to main content

All Aboard: Grand Central Station Apple Retail Workers Move to Unionize


Workers at an Apple retail location in Grand Central Station in New York City are taking steps to become the first Apple retail location to form a union.

These Apple workers have already voted to affiliate with Workers United, the labor union that has been assisting workers at Starbucks with their unionization efforts.  At present, efforts are underway to collect enough signatures from workers at the Grand Central Station location to hold an election.  Aligning with Workers United is seen as a step toward using the momentum of unionization at Starbucks to successfully unionize Apple retail locations.

It is worth noting that these Apple workers at Grand Central Station join a few other Apple retail locations that are also undergoing a unionization push.  As with many retail workers, Apple retail workers are fighting for increased pay ($30/hour) and better benefits (including tuition reimbursement, increased vacation time, and higher match rates for 401(k) plans).  It has been suggested that the surge in business for Apple during the coronavirus pandemic has led to its workers experiencing burnout amidst stagnant pay while the company continues to rake in record profits.

Will workers at this Grand Central Station retail location obtain enough signatures to hold an election?  I think it is quite likely.  If/when that happens, will these workers actually vote to unionize?  As we have seen with the successful unionizations at Starbucks and the Staten Island Amazon warehouse, anything is possible.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per