Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: SB 1044 (California)


As with many labor & employment law related cases (and bills) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


In mid February, SB 1044 was introduced in the California Senate by Democratic Senator Maria Durango.  The proposed legislation would enable employees to leave work or refuse to show up if the employee subjectively feels unsafe regardless of existing health and safety standards or whether the employer has provided health and safety precautions.  The legislation would also prohibit an employer from preventing any employee from accessing a mobile device (or other communication device) to seek emergency assistance, assessing the safety of the situation, or communicating with a person to confirm their safety.  

Note, this legislation would only apply when there is a “state of emergency”…such as Covid, in which California is still under a state of emergency.  While that particular state of emergency will (hopefully) end soon(ish) in California, it can (and likely will) be reinstated at some point down the road or some other situation will evolve that creates another state of emergency.  This is my way of suggesting that a state of emergency could potentially always exist in California such that employees could lawfully leave work or refuse to show up because of their belief that they would feel unsafe.

So under SB 1044, if an employee that does not feel safe because they are exposed to someone that is not vaccinated, not wearing a mask, is standing closer than 6 feet, etc., they could lawfully leave work and not be subjected to punishment by the employer…so long as a state of emergency exists.

As some readers might imagine, this could be a potentially chaotic situation given that SB 1044 does not provide a carve out for emergency workers such that a police officer, medic, firefighter, etc could choose to walk off the job because of a concern over their safety.  The consequences (and potential dangers) that could happen if these workers left the job are massive.

At this time, SB 1044 is still working its way through the California Senate.  Keep an eye on this one, if for no other reason that it is one of the most unique employment or labor law related bills I have seen in some time.


For additional information:  https://legiscan.com/CA/bill/SB1044/2021


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more