Skip to main content

DC Voters to Have Say on Whether to Eliminate the Tipped Wage…Or Will They?


Hang onto your hats because this is an interesting story.

Initiative 82 is a potential ballot measure that might go before voters in Washington, DC this coming June in which voters would be able to do away with the tipped wage in the city.  If approved, Initiative 82 would require that tipped workers (who currently receive $5.05/hour, plus tips) have their pay rate increased to $15.20/hour.  Eliminating this sort of sub minimum wage is a common fight for minimum wage advocates around the country.  

Now in order for a ballot initiative to get before voters, at least 5% of registered voters in DC must provide their signature as well as at least 5% of registered voters from five of DC’s eight wards.  Last week it was announced that the 5% requirement of registered voters in DC was met.  However, the DC Board of Elections noted that it was not yet clear whether the 5% of registered voters from five of DC’s eight wards had been satisfied.  According to reports, 122 signatures in one ward are under scrutiny.  If this particular ward is found to have fallen short of the required signatures, Initiative 82 will not make it to the June ballot.

Readers might recall that Initiative 82 sounds a lot like Initiative 77 that DC voters had approved in 2018.  Initiative 77 also sought to do away with the two tier wage system (for tipped and non tipped workers).  While voters approved Initiative 77, it was eventually sidelined by the DC Council after employers and restaurant groups pushed back against it.  Will voters get a second bite at the apple?  For starters, they at least need to get Initiative 82 on the ballot.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more