Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

 

While this is not necessarily a minimum wage dedicated post, I think it certainly trends in that direction given the two articles I am highlighting this week.  For starters, a recent development at Target in regard to the entire compensation package offered to employees is noteworthy.  When taking into account a proposal to eliminate the minimum wage rate in California (proposed by a candidate in the recall election for Governor), there is a lot for readers to chew on here.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Target Offers to Pay 100% of College Tuition In Effort to Attract Workers

As CNBC reported earlier this week, Target is offering to pay 100% of college tuition for its workers (in approximately 250 degree programs) as the big box retailer competes with other employers to attract workers.  While other companies such as Chipotle, WalMart, and Chipotle have implemented similar college tuition offers to entice workers to come aboard, Target’s program is unique in so much that workers (at stores, distribution centers, and headquarters) would qualify on their first day on the job.  For those workers that do not choose to pursue one of the 250 degree programs Target has identified, Target will still pay up to $5,250 for non-master’s degrees and up to $10,000 for master’s degrees.  For those looking for a job (and interested in going to college), get your application into Target sooner rather than later.


Larry Elder, Candidate in California’s Recall Election, Calls for $0.00 Minimum Wage Rate

File this one under “sensationalist” headline...but maybe there is a bit more here once you dig in.  As readers might have heard, there is an upcoming recall election in California for Governor.  Many (and I do mean many) candidates are running to replace the current Governor, Gavin Newsom.  One candidate, Larry Elder, recently spoke out on the rising minimum wage rate in the state and suggested that the rate should actually be $0.00.  Yes, $0.00.  As The Sacramento Bee reported, Elder suggested that the current rate ($14/hour for employers with 26 or more employees and $13/hour for employers with fewer) stifles employers and imposes an unnecessary burden on them with rising labor costs.  Instead, Elder seems to believe that the free market would dictate wage rates, presumably with employers raising their wage rates to attract workers.  While that might be the case for some employers, I think it just as easy to envision a situation where employers in a given industry would intentionally suppress wages and keep pay at poverty levels (or below) since there would be no minimum wage rate.  Will Elder’s proposal work?  Maybe.  However, he first needs to win that recall election for this to be a realistic possibility.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more