Skip to main content

United States Supreme Court Rejects Vaccine Mandate Appeal…Would a Similar Ruling Be Expected in the Employment Context?


In recent weeks, United States Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett rejected an appeal from Indiana University students that sought to contest the lawfulness of Indiana University’s coronavirus vaccine mandate as a condition of enrollment for the fall 2021 semester.

As readers might have likely seen, vaccine mandates in the workplace (and elsewhere) have become a hot button issue.  With the rejection of the appeal, Indiana University can lawfully require students to be vaccinated in order to attend classes this fall.  However, the fact that Justice Barrett did not comment on the rejection of the appeal has left some questions as to whether the Supreme Court is indicating its agreement with vaccine mandates…or if this rejection of the appeal was more focused on the specific facts of the Indiana University case and would not necessarily apply to other related situations.

Although the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission had released guidance earlier this year that employers could mandate vaccines as a condition of employment (with exceptions for religious or medical reasons), these mandates have been relatively untested in court so far.  (Notwithstanding a decision from a court in Texas finding vaccine mandates for employees at a hospital to be lawful.)  With that being said, there is some precedent, that vaccine mandates are lawful (as set out in a 1905 Supreme Court opinion in Jacobson v. Massachusetts.)  However, whether a rather dusty case from over a century ago would still hold up in regard to a mandatory coronavirus vaccine policy in the workplace remains to be seen.

Something tells me that sooner or later, the Supreme Court is likely going to weigh in on the matter rather than simply rejecting an appeal without comment, as happened in this case.


For additional information:  https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/12/us/supreme-court-indiana-university-covid-vaccine-mandate.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie Vetoes Minimum Wage Hike

A few months ago, readers might remember that I pointed out that the New Jersey Legislature had voted to approve a minimum wage hike in the state .  Under the approved legislation, the minimum wage rate would rise to $10.10/hour in the next year and at least $15/hour over the next five.  (The current minimum wage rate in the state is $8.38/hour).  In that article, I had noted that the bill was then going to go before Governor Chris Christie for his approval or veto. As I had suggested previously, I thought that the Governor would likely veto the bill based upon his prior actions and comments on similar legislation.  Well, a few days ago, Governor Christie did just that and vetoed the bill on the grounds that it "would trigger an escalation of wages that will make doing business in New Jersey unfathomable."  Pointing to the increase in hourly minimum wage rates, the Governor referred to the bill as a "really radical increase."  (It is interesting to c...
Post a Comment
Read more