Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

 

Yesterday, I noted a recent National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) decision in regard to union elections conducted by mail in voting and the potential impact it could have on the mail in voting occurring at the Amazon Alabama location.  A recent development on that union election in Alabama is worth leading things off this week.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


As Union Vote Appears to Be Slipping, Contested Mail In Ballots Take Center Stage

The New York Post reported yesterday that with approximately half the mail in ballots at the Amazon Alabama location having been counted, there appears to be a commanding majority vote against unionization so far.  (From the reports, about 70% of the ballots counted so far have been against unionization.)  With that being said, there are about 500 ballots that have been challenged by Amazon and the union.  Note, there were 3,215 votes cast in the union election with these 500 ballots making up about 15% of the vote.  The NLRB has stated it would make a ruling on the challenged ballots if they would be needed to determine the election’s outcome.  Although, as noted above, with there reportedly being a majority of votes cast against unionization in the count at this point, the NLRB might not even need to make a ruling on the challenged ballots.  While the count is not over, for those hoping for unionization of this Amazon location, things are not looking favorable at this time.


As Pandemic Wears On, Behavioral Anhedonia Grows

For those keeping track at home, the SAT word this week is behavioral anhedonia...courtesy of this article from The New York Times.  Behavioral anhedonia means the loss of ability to take pleasure in activities, which has come about following over a year into the coronavirus pandemic.  As the article notes, a growing number of workers are reporting a feeling of being burned out and less productive, despite having more free time (due in part to lock downs and less time spent commuting.)  Behavioral anhedonia has resulted, with many workers finding less interest in their work and less satisfaction out of getting things accomplished.  One worker in particular noted a sense of dread when she now hears her inbox chime with a new message.  This article does not provide a definitive guide on how to effectively scale back this behavioral anhedonia.  However, it does offer some insight into what many workers are currently experiencing as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.


California Employers: Remember Local Right of Recall Ordinances

With California slowly starting to reopen certain sectors of the state’s economy, more and more employers are being allowed to reopen (or open larger portions of their businesses) to customers.  As a result, while many workers were let go after the past year as employers sought to slash labor costs, there is going to be a growing need for more workers to be hired (or re-hired).  This article notes that while a statewide right of recall law was not approved, there are several local ordinances throughout the state that require employers to offer “qualified” workers a job as job openings become available.  While the list is not extensive, it is worth a quick review.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more