Skip to main content

As Amazon Alabama Union Vote Wraps Up, Eyes Turn to Other Amazon Unionization Efforts

 

Today, voting is to wrap up at the Bessemer, Alabama Amazon location where workers are attempting to unionize.  While the outcome of the union election will not be immediately know, attention has already turned to potential unionization at other Amazon locations.

Readers will recall that Amazon had previously opposed a mail in vote, instead requesting  the election be delayed until it was safe to hold in person.  After Amazon’s efforts to stop the mail in vote failed, the seven week mail in election got underway.  While many politicians have decided to wade into the fray and voice their support (or opposition) to the election, the relative absence of President Joe Biden has taken many by surprise.  Given his vocal support for unions during the previous election, many thought he would lend his voice to the unionization efforts at the Alabama location.  (After all, a unionization of this Amazon fulfillment center would be a big step toward cutting into the company’s successful efforts to beat back unionization in the U.S.).

With that being said, workers at a few other Amazon locations in Baltimore, New Orleans, and Southern California, have reportedly begun to explore a potential unionization.  Granted, rumblings and discussions about unionizing does not mean unionization efforts would be successful.  However, I would expect that should the Alabama location unionize (or even come close to unionizing), workers at other Amazon locations would become emboldened to try their hand at forming a union.  This is a matter worth keeping an eye on going forward.


For additional information:  https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-amazon-union-alabama-20210322-7mut7ccizjhaxgb4nzr57gav4y-story.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

What I've Been Reading This Week

Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it .  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate. For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA. As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week. ...

Senator Bernie Sanders To Introduce Bill Requiring Large Corporations To Pay For Federal Assistance Programs

Next week, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is set to introduce legislation which would require large employers such as Walmart, Amazon, and McDonald's to fully cover the cost of food stamps, public housing, Medicaid, and other federal assistance programs that their employees receive.  Senator Sanders has stated that the goal is to force these large employers to pay their employees a living wage and cut back on the nearly $150 billion in taxpayer dollars that go toward funding these federal programs every year. As for the specifics, a 100% tax on government benefits received would be imposed on government benefits received by workers at companies with 500 or more employees.  For instance, if a Walmart employee received $500 in food stamps, Walmart would be taxed $500. To call this proposed legislation groundbreaking would be an understatement.  I would expect that Senator Sanders, an Independent that caucuses with Democrats, is going to face an uphill battle gett...