Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

 

Apologies for those wanting to talk about GameStop or AMC stocks this week.  Having a discussion on shorting stocks, floats, and squeeze plays is better served for Reddit, Discord, or whatever other form of stock discussion your prefer.  This week I read through some thought provoking articles.  One in particular that caught my eye dealt with employers giving their employees a set amount of “free time” (or autonomy time”) each week to work on projects of their own choosing.  As the below article points out, this might have a lasting positive impact for both employers and employees alike.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Autonomy Programs Have Worked At Big Tech...Why Not Try Elsewhere?

Autonomy programs have been in place at several big tech companies for years, including 3M, Google, FaceBook, LinkedIn, and Apple, among others.  While these autonomy programs differ a bit from each employer, they generally allow employees a set amount of time each week to work on projects of their own.  As the article from Fast Company notes, this has produced a host of several developments, including Google Maps and Gmail.  Studies have found that allowing workers the freedom to work on projects of their own choosing has led them to be more productive and motivated.  While I am not suggesting that all employers give their employees a set amount of time each week to go off and do what they want, carving out some time for employees to tinker with their projects might end up paying dividends in the log run.


Walmart CEO Suggests Higher (Regional) Wage Hikes Might Be Appropriate

Bloomberg published an article last week in which it noted that Walmart CEO, Doug McMillon, recently suggested that while the federal minimum wage rate of $7.25/hour is too low, regional economics should be taken into account when considering a federal minimum wage hike.  McMillon pointed out that a wage hike that took into account “geographic differences” and “small business” would be vital to ensure the viability of many businesses around the country.  If the federal minimum wage rate was increased to $15/hour, as a growing number of members in Congress have started to call for, it would likely have a detrimental impact on some areas of the country in which employers could not manage the surge in labor costs.  McMillon’s comments are noteworthy, in part as it is coming from the head of a nationwide employer that has over 1.5 million employees.


Amazon Pushes For In Person Union Election

Readers may have heard some of the hoopla recently over Amazon arguing to the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) that an upcoming election at one of the company’s facilities in Alabama should be conducted in person, rather than by mail.   The union election, set to start February 8th and run for seven weeks, would allow approximately 6,000 workers at the Bessemer, Alabama Amazon location to vote by mail on whether to be represented by the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union.  Amazon has appealed a prior ruling on the matter to the NLRB arguing that NLRB’s pandemic voting policy is flawed therefore making mail in voting an unrealistic option.  Will Amazon succeed in its attempt to have an in person election?  While the NLRB might move back the planned start to the election by a few weeks, I would be surprised if the election was ultimately switched to in person voting.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

Happening Tomorrow: Connecticut’s Minimum Wage Increases

For those employers and employees alike in Connecticut, mark your calendars as tomorrow, the minimum wage rate increases in the state from $13/hour to $14/hour. This wage hike comes after Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont had signed Public Act 19-4 into law in 2019 which progressively raised the state’s hourly minimum wage rate every year for five years.  In fact, next year, the hourly wage rate will top out at $15/hour.  Beginning in January of 2024, the hourly wage rate will be indexed to the employment cost index. For additional information:   https://portal.ct.gov/Office-of-the-Governor/News/Press-Releases/2022/06-2022/Governor-Lamont-Reminds-Residents-That-Minimum-Wage-Is-Scheduled-To-Increase-on-Friday
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more