Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week: President Joe Biden Edition

 

Apologies to those expecting a post talking about more nuanced labor & employment law topics without a touch of politics.  With this week being the inauguration and the incoming administration already taking action with the termination of the National Labor Relations Board’s General Counsel Wednesday evening, there are a couple related topics that are highly relevant to close out the week.  While the last article is not necessarily “President Biden” specific, I wanted to highlight the article to provide readers a bit of food for thought.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Biden Administration’s Potential $15/Hour Minimum Wage Hike & the Ramifications

On the heels of Joe Biden getting sworn in on Wednesday, there are already talks over a potential federal minimum wage hike to $15/hour.  With Democrats controlling both the House and Senate, it is likely (if not probable) that we will see a minimum wage bill headed to President Biden’s desk sooner rather than later.  In anticipation of that, the Congressional Budget Office has released a report in which it speculates that approximately 3.7 million jobs would be lost if the federal minimum wage rate got raised to $15/hour.  Whether that figure is too conservative (or too liberal) is up for debate.  Should the federal minimum wage rate be increased during President Biden’s term, however, we might see whether this 3.7 million job loss forecast is on the money.


What A Paid Leave Policy Might Look Like Under a President Biden Administration

The New York Times made note earlier this week of a paid leave proposal being floated by the Biden administration.  Under the proposal, full and part time workers would be paid up to $1,400/week (to replace their wages) to take fourteen weeks (or more) of paid leave.  The grounds for using the paid leave would include:  an employee being sick with coronavirus symptoms, quarantine because of coronavirus exposure, needing time off to get a vaccine, caring for family members who are sick with coronavirus symptoms, caring for children whose school or day care center was closed because of the pandemic, and caring for older relatives or adult dependents whose long term care facilities were closed because of the pandemic.  As many readers are likely wondering, how would the paid leave be funded?  Employers with less than 500 employees would be reimbursed in the form of a payroll tax credit.  Larger employers would be required to cover the cost themselves.  Will this proposal make it across the finish line?  With the prior paid leave lapsing and Congress intent to do something, while this proposal might be a starting point, I think it is likely we will see something in the coming months.


Would You Give Up Your Vacation Time In Exchange For Remote Work?

According to a recent study, approximately 50% of those polled said they would give up their vacation time in exchange for being allowed to work remotely.  As we have seen over the past ten or so months, while allowing employees to work remotely might have been untenable at first, it has quickly become commonplace (and successful) for many.  That is not to say there will not continue to be hiccups for many that choose to work remotely.  However, with many employees still being given latitude to determine when they feel comfortable returning to the workplace (kudos to those employers that remain flexible...while I refrain from too harshly chastising those employers that demand employees return to the workplace), perhaps a trade off of (some) vacation time for remote work is not out of the question.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

What I've Been Reading This Week

Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it .  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate. For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA. As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Senator Bernie Sanders To Introduce Bill Requiring Large Corporations To Pay For Federal Assistance Programs

Next week, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is set to introduce legislation which would require large employers such as Walmart, Amazon, and McDonald's to fully cover the cost of food stamps, public housing, Medicaid, and other federal assistance programs that their employees receive.  Senator Sanders has stated that the goal is to force these large employers to pay their employees a living wage and cut back on the nearly $150 billion in taxpayer dollars that go toward funding these federal programs every year. As for the specifics, a 100% tax on government benefits received would be imposed on government benefits received by workers at companies with 500 or more employees.  For instance, if a Walmart employee received $500 in food stamps, Walmart would be taxed $500. To call this proposed legislation groundbreaking would be an understatement.  I would expect that Senator Sanders, an Independent that caucuses with Democrats, is going to face an uphill battle gett...
Post a Comment
Read more