Skip to main content

NLRB Affirms Lawful (& Unlawful) Portions of Employer Handbooks

 

Medic Ambulance Services, Inc. - NLRB


Facts:  Medic Ambulance Services, Inc. (“Medic”) had a handbook in place for its employees which included restrictions on its employees using social media, non-solicitation and non-distribution provisions, as well as a prohibition on conducting personal business on company time.  An unfair labor practice charge was filed against Medic on the grounds that the handbook violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) by restricting protected, concerted activity.

An Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found these three portions of Medic’s handbook to be unlawful.  The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) was thereafter asked to weigh in on the matter.

Analysis:  The NLRB made quick work of the ALJ’s decision.  In relevant part, the NLRB considered the three parts of Medic’s handbook in order:

Social Media Policy

Medic’s social media policy prohibited inappropriate communications, disclosure of confidential information, use of Medic’s name to disparage people, or the posting of pictures of coworkers.  The NLRB reversed the ALJ’s decision and held that this portion of Medic’s handbook was written in such a way that it would not be reasonably construed to limit protected, concerted activity.

Non-Solicitation/Non-Distribution Policy

In particular, this portion of Medic’s handbook prohibited employees from “solicitation or distribution of literature for any purpose during working hours without prior authorization from management.”  Adopting the ALJ’s decision, the NLRB found this portion of Medic’s handbook violated the NLRA as it was overly broad and presumptively invalid since it would be reasonably construed that employees were barred from this conduct during break times.  Further, it has long been held that a prohibition on the distribution of union ligature during non working hours in non working areas is presumptively unlawful.  In addition, requiring management approval ran afoul of NLRB precedent that any rule which required employees to secure permission before engaging in protected, concerted activity in an employee’s free time in a non work area is unlawful.  Consequently, the language in the handbook prohibiting solicitation or distribution was found to not be sufficiently clear as to employee rights.  As worded, this portion of the handbook was found to be in violation of Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA.

Conducting Personal Business

Turning to the final contested portion of Medic’s handbook, there was a rule against “conducting personal business on company time or company property for any purpose during working hours without prior authorization from management.”  In this instance, the NLRB again adopted the ALJ’s decision and found this portion of Medic’s handbook to be in violation of the NLRA to the extent it failed to clarify that the restrictions did not apply during non working times and in non working areas.  As a result, the NLRB found this portion of the handbook violated Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA as it could be construed as banning protected, concerted activity.

The Takeaway:  What went wrong for Medic here?  I think it is relatively straightforward:  The two sections of its handbook that were found to be unlawful were simply written to be too broad (or open to too much interpretation.)  As noted above, had Medic clarified that these two sections of the handbook did not apply to non working times and in non working areas, it is possible, if not likely, it would have survived scrutiny.  However, I believe the NLRB was correct in finding there was simply too much wiggle room in these sections of the handbook that it could be reasonably read as unlawfully stifling protected, concerted activity.

Date:  January 4, 2021

Order:  https://apps.nlrb.gov/link/document.aspx/09031d45833291e3

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more