Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

 

With spring right around the corner (after all, Daylight Saving Time is this weekend), it is about the time of year when Girl Scouts will be outside your local grocer selling cookies.  That leads to an article I highlighted below which addresses whether an employer can allow a group like the Girl Scouts on their property while prohibiting other non employees (such as a union).  I will bury the lede and let readers find out more in the below article.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Girl Scouts vs. Unions...Can An Employer Lawfully Exclude One From the Premises But Not the Other?

I am sure many readers have gone to the grocery store before and seen Girl Scouts (or sometimes Boy Scouts) selling cookies outside the entrance or exit.  However, in my experience, I cannot recall ever seeing a labor union handing out pamphlets outside these same grocery store doors.  That begs the question:  Can an employer lawfully exclude one group from its premises while allowing another?  As Matthew Christoph writes, that answer is a resounding yes.  A National Labor Relations Board 2019 decision, Kroger Limited Partnership, held that an employer may bar non employees from protesting against businesses on the employer’s property while allowing non protest activities (such as solicitations for charitable donations or civic groups.)  So for those readers that are looking to load up on Girl Scout cookies this spring when making a run to their local grocer, you are in luck!


With Texas Governor Doing Away With Mask Requirement, OSHA Considerations For Employers Remain

Earlier this week, Texas Governor Greg Abbott decided to lift the mask mandate for Texans, much to the chagrin of many across the state.  For the purposes of this post, I would call attention to an article from The National Law Review which noted that even with the mask mandate being lifted, employers in the state still need to be wary of their obligations under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSHA”).  As readers might recall, OSHA sets out certain workplace safety requirements that employers must comply with.  In the case of the coronavirus pandemic, OSHA recently published guidance that suggests using masks in the workplace can slow the spread of the coronavirus.  While Governor Abbott’s measure impacts state law, OSHA is a federal law that employers in the state still need to follow.  For the time being, doing away with a mask requirement in the workplace might not be the best option.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

What I've Been Reading This Week

Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it .  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate. For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA. As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Senator Bernie Sanders To Introduce Bill Requiring Large Corporations To Pay For Federal Assistance Programs

Next week, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is set to introduce legislation which would require large employers such as Walmart, Amazon, and McDonald's to fully cover the cost of food stamps, public housing, Medicaid, and other federal assistance programs that their employees receive.  Senator Sanders has stated that the goal is to force these large employers to pay their employees a living wage and cut back on the nearly $150 billion in taxpayer dollars that go toward funding these federal programs every year. As for the specifics, a 100% tax on government benefits received would be imposed on government benefits received by workers at companies with 500 or more employees.  For instance, if a Walmart employee received $500 in food stamps, Walmart would be taxed $500. To call this proposed legislation groundbreaking would be an understatement.  I would expect that Senator Sanders, an Independent that caucuses with Democrats, is going to face an uphill battle gett...
Post a Comment
Read more