Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


Another week comes and goes and for many, the work from home arrangement remains a constant.  On that note, I came across a few articles this week which relate to that topic.  One deals with employers taking steps to sidestep potential wage and hour issues with employees working remotely.  Another addressed ideas on how to conduct remote job screening.  Turning to other topics, I highlight news from Home Depot and UPS, as it relates it to the workplace.  And of course, let us not forget an article which surmises what unions (and employers) might expect from a President Joe Biden administration.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week


Employers: With Remote Work, Beware of Potential Wage & Hour Issues

The Wage & Hour Litigation Blog recently published an article in which it recognized that with many employees working remotely right now, potential wage & hour issues may arise.  For instance, some states mandate rest or meal breaks during a workday.  With some employees working remotely, that can make it tougher to ensure the mandated breaks are being taken.  As well, generally speaking, a non-exempt employee is entitled to the pay rate of the jurisdiction where the work is performed.  If an employee is working remotely in a different city or state with a higher wage rate, it is possible they would be entitled to that higher pay rate.  I refer readers to the rest of the article for a rather thought provoking analysis of the topic.


Home Depot to Put $1 Billion Toward Employee Pay

On the heels of Home Depot’s earnings report released earlier this week, the company announced it would spend $1 billion more and put it toward raising pay for its employees.  (Yes, $1 billion.)  As some readers might have heard, Home Depot has enjoyed a rather strong year (financially speaking) and has in turn decided to dramatically increase pay for many employees as a result.  Will other businesses follow suit?  Perhaps.  Although for the time being, this is a major development for a nationwide employer.


A President Joe Biden Administration: Expected Friend to the Unions

NBC News published an article on Sunday recognizing that after a rather tumultuous four years under President Donald Trump, many labor unions are expecting to fair much better under a President Joe Biden administration.  As the article points out, Biden has long been considered friendly toward labor unions and is viewed by many as being a catalyst to stopping a prolonged decline in union membership.  With Biden winning union households 56% to President Trump’s 40%, Biden enjoys the support of union workers that view him as one of their own.  The question will inevitably turn to exactly what Biden can do for unions.  I would expect him to appoint labor friendly Board Members to the National Labor Relations Board for starters.  As well, it would not surprise me to see him nominate labor friendly supporters to positions at the Labor Department in addition to signing executive orders increasing workplace safety measures.


UPS Changes Policy; Will Allow Bear & Natural Hairstyles

Late last week, HRDive noted that United Parcel Service (“UPS”) had decided to change its workplace policies and procedures to allow beards, facial hair, and natural hairstyles.  This decision came about following a petition by many employees requesting a change.  Let us also not forget that some states, such as New York, California, and Washington, have outlawed discrimination against workers on the basis of their natural hairstyle.  While the decision from UPS to change is workplace policies and procedures apparently did not have anything to do with a claim of discrimination, perhaps theses state laws spurred UPS toward a change?


Tips For Improving Remote Job Screening

Many employers and those in the HR field have at one point or another, over the past eight months, posted a job opening and conducted much of the job screening remotely.  In doing so, it an often prove more challenging than conducting the hiring process in person.  Andrew Greenberg recently wrote an article in which he identified five tips for importing remote job screening during the coronavirus pandemic.  Even if all of the tips are not applicable to each hiring situation, this is still a resource worth reviewing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per