Skip to main content

Labor Department: Employees Must Be Compensated For Time Spent Watching Training Webinars During Work Hours

 

Last week, the Labor Department issued an opinion letter in which it stated that employees must be paid for time spent watching training webinars during work hours, even if the webinar is not directly related to the job.

In the opinion letter, the Labor Department considered whether an employer was required to pay its employees for time spent watching training webinars.  When it came to voluntary education training, the employer required its employees to substitute paid time off or vacation time when the employee attended these training sessions during work hours.  No compensation was paid if the employees attended training sessions after work hours.

The Labor Department recognized that the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) requires employers to compensate employees for their work.  In this instance, the Labor Department found that even when training is voluntary and could be conducted/viewed outside of regular work hours, that was “immaterial.”  The FLSA dictated that “work not requested but suffered or permitted is work time” and therefore compensable.  With that being said, the Labor Department did point out that employers could prohibit watching training webinars during work hours, if they so chose.

While this opinion letter is instructive, the letter (as they all do) recognized that it was an opinion letter that came about based upon the particular facts as presented.  As a result, the Labor Department left some leeway to vary from this opinion letter in the future, if presented with similar (but slightly different) facts on the same issue.


For a copy of the opinion letter:  https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/WHD/opinion-letters/FLSA/2020_11_03_15_FLSA.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more