Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week: Work From Home Edition


Yet another week of (work from home) work has come and gone.  With that comes the opportunity to look at a few articles which have taken a deep dive into the dynamics of work from home...both from the perspective of those impacted by the large number of workers that are currently working remotely as well as from the viewpoint of the workers themselves.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.



On Monday, Google announced that it was extending the option for most of its employees to work from home through June of 2021.  As The San Francisco Chronicle reports, with many of the company’s employees already working remotely, there has been a noticeable dip in the housing market in the Bay Area, a plunge in leases in the area, and a direct hit to San Francisco’s bars and restaurants.  (With much of the company’s employees being located in the Bay Area, this would undoubtedly be an area severely hampered by having many of Google’s employees not in the office.)   With this announcement of an even longer work from home option being provided to employers, it is somewhat sobering to think of the effect this will continue to have on the Bay Area over the coming months.



Eleanor Cummins at Vox write a recent article which tracked the emergence of work from home as an option for workers from some of its earlier roots in the 1970’s through today.  In the article, attention is paid to large scale employers such as Yahoo, IBM, and FaceBook in an effort to show that while work from home has curtailed in recent years (before the coronavirus pandemic started, only about 14% of workers in the country worked from home five or more days per week), that has taken a sharp reversal.  However, with nearly half the workforce working from home now, the prevalence of distractions from work abound.  Although the article does not give employers or employees a full proof guide on how to cut out the distractions, it does provide a few stories about how some workers are coping that I believe are worth a read.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...