Skip to main content

Happening Today: Nevada’s Hourly Minimum Wage Rate Increases


Effective today, July 1st, the hourly minimum wage rate in Nevada is set to increase as follows:  rising to $8/hour if the employer offers qualifying health benefits and rising to $9/hour if the employer does not offer qualifying health benefits.

Readers might be wondering, “Ok, and what exactly is a “qualifying health benefit” in Nevada?”  In order to answer that question, we need to look at a Nevada Supreme Court case from 2018, MDC Restaurants, LLC v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court.  In that case, the Nevada Supreme Court held that under the Minimum Wage Amendment Act (which provides for the two tier minimum wage setup in the state), an employer who pays one dollar per hour less in wages must provide a benefit in the form of health insurance that is at least equivalent to the one dollar per hour in wages that the employee would otherwise receive.

The Nevada Legislature stepped in afterward and passed Senate Bill 192 in 2019 to clarify that an employer may pay the lower minimum wage rate if health benefits were available to the employee and the employee’s dependents in a health benefit plan that included:

  • Ambulatory patient services
  • Emergency services
  • Hospitalization
  • Maternity and newborn care
  • Mental health and substance use disorder services
  • Prescription drugs
  • Rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices
  • Laboratory services
  • Preventative and wellness services and chronic disease management
  • Pediatric services
  • Any other health care service or coverage level required to be included in an individual or group health benefit plan pursuant to a Nevada statute

This minimum wage hike comes on the heels of Assembly Bill 456 that was passed last year.  Under that legislation, there will be subsequent annual minimum wage increases of $.75/hour through 2024.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more