Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


I think it might have been appropriate to title this something along the lines of “What I’ve Been Reading This Week:  Corporate Edition”.  As readers can see from the below, there are a few developments over at Starbucks and Amazon over the past few days, in relation to relevant employment and labor law matters.  Both articles are worth a read, if for no other reason than to see how some employers are managing workplace issues in light of recent current events.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.



Earlier this morning, CNBC reported that Starbucks had reversed course and decided to allow its employees to wear Black Lives Matter (“BLM”) apparel and accessories in the workplace.  In recent days, Starbucks had placed a prohibition on its employees wearing or displaying anything affiliated with BLM while at work.  However, after receiving a wave of backlash by critics who pointed out that the company allowed employees to wear and display support for LGBTQ causes, Starbucks has changed its policy.  Perhaps they did not want to get into a prolonged battle over workplace apparel, as In-N-Out Burger had?



Jaclyn Diaz over at Bloomberg Law wrote an article recently in which she recognized that Amazon has noticeably bulked up its workplace safety team in recent months.  Since the start of the year, Amazon has hired twenty people for in house counsel and adviser roles, with a focus on bolstering the company's workplace safety and labor and employment litigation section.  Earlier this week, I had noted that Amazon (along with other employers) was under fire for claims that the company had not taken appropriate steps to protect its workers from the coronavirus pandemic.  While these hires were made before the coronavirus pandemic really took off, it is worth noting that Amazon is moving to aggressively shore up its team to deal with potential workplace safety issues going forward.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more