Skip to main content

EEOC: Proper Use of IRS Form 8850 For WOTC Does Not Run Afoul of Anti-Discrimination Laws


At the end of April, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) issued an opinion letter which confirmed its belief that the proper use of Internal Revenue Service Form 8850 (“Form 8850”) for the Federal Work Opportunity Tax Credit (“WOTC”) does not run afoul of anti-discrimination laws.

For those not familiar with the WOTC, it provides employers with a tax credit by encouraging them to “hire and train people who are experiencing severe difficulties that are often linked to unemployment.”  Those employment candidates that enable an employer to qualify for the WOTC include recipients of some state and federal aid programs (such as food stamps), those that have finished or are still working through some rehabilitation services, and some individuals convicted of felonies.  Form 8850 requires that these individuals self identify and provide information to confirm the employer is entitled to the tax credit.

Naturally, there has been some concern and hesitation among employers over whether this requested information puts them in violation of anti-discrimination laws.  However, the EEOC’s April 29th opinion letter should provide some reassurance.  In the opinion letter itself, the EEOC states that the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) are not violated as the questions themselves on Form 8850 do not require applicants to actually disclose if they have a disability (which could be prohibited under the ADA), provide age related information (which could be prohibited under the ADEA), or whether they are a member of a protected group (which could be prohibited under Title VII.)

As always, there are caveats to remember here.  The EEOC is not giving employers the green light to ask for any information or documentation they want in order to qualify for the WOTC.  Rather, so long as employers strictly comply with Form 8850, taking part in the WOTC in and of itself does not mean an employer has violated an anti-discrimination law.


For a copy of the opinion letter:  https://www.eeoc.gov/commission-opinion-letter-federal-work-opportunity-tax-credit-form-8850

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies i...
Post a Comment
Read more

What I've Been Reading This Week

Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it .  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate. For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA. As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week. ...
Post a Comment
Read more