Skip to main content

EEOC: Proper Use of IRS Form 8850 For WOTC Does Not Run Afoul of Anti-Discrimination Laws


At the end of April, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) issued an opinion letter which confirmed its belief that the proper use of Internal Revenue Service Form 8850 (“Form 8850”) for the Federal Work Opportunity Tax Credit (“WOTC”) does not run afoul of anti-discrimination laws.

For those not familiar with the WOTC, it provides employers with a tax credit by encouraging them to “hire and train people who are experiencing severe difficulties that are often linked to unemployment.”  Those employment candidates that enable an employer to qualify for the WOTC include recipients of some state and federal aid programs (such as food stamps), those that have finished or are still working through some rehabilitation services, and some individuals convicted of felonies.  Form 8850 requires that these individuals self identify and provide information to confirm the employer is entitled to the tax credit.

Naturally, there has been some concern and hesitation among employers over whether this requested information puts them in violation of anti-discrimination laws.  However, the EEOC’s April 29th opinion letter should provide some reassurance.  In the opinion letter itself, the EEOC states that the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) are not violated as the questions themselves on Form 8850 do not require applicants to actually disclose if they have a disability (which could be prohibited under the ADA), provide age related information (which could be prohibited under the ADEA), or whether they are a member of a protected group (which could be prohibited under Title VII.)

As always, there are caveats to remember here.  The EEOC is not giving employers the green light to ask for any information or documentation they want in order to qualify for the WOTC.  Rather, so long as employers strictly comply with Form 8850, taking part in the WOTC in and of itself does not mean an employer has violated an anti-discrimination law.


For a copy of the opinion letter:  https://www.eeoc.gov/commission-opinion-letter-federal-work-opportunity-tax-credit-form-8850

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more