Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


I found a few good articles to focus on this week, including a tip from a loyal reader of the blog about EEOC guidance as to the applicability of the ADA while we deal with the coronavirus pandemic.  As I note below, this guidance is routinely updated by the EEOC, but it is worth reviewing to see what is/is not acceptable conduct in the workplace (without running afoul of the ADA), while dealing with the coronavirus.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


With Work From Home the Norm For Many, Privacy Concerns Among Workers Rise

Many workers have likely transitioned to some semblance of a work from home setup over the past few weeks or months.  For some, that work from home arrangement includes having zoom meetings, calls, virtual meeting rooms, instant messaging, etc. with their co-workers, employers, and customers/clients.  However, while the work from home setup has become the norm for many workers, some are expressing hesitation over the potential privacy ramifications that have arisen over this increased use of technology while away from the traditional workplace.  The Washington Post published an article recently that noted there are several different companies that offer software that enable employers to monitor how much work their employees do by taking screen shots of the computers of their employees, tracking the time logged in on work computers, tracking the amount of activity over a given timeframe, etc.  Of course, this is not even taking into account concerns over webcams and microphones being monitored as well to track employee productivity.  While there is likely no middle ground here, in regard to allowing employers to effectively monitor the work output of their employees versus the need for privacy, this article has some interesting things to consider as work from home continues for many across the country.


Before UFC 249, Fighters Required to Sign Agreement Not to Disparage Company’s Coronavirus Prevention Measures

Bloomberg published an article over the past weekend, following Saturday evening’s UFC 249 event that took place in Florida, which noted that the UFC apparently required those that fought in the event to sign a non-disparagement agreement, agreeing not to criticize the company’s safety protocols.  In addition to signing the non-disparagement document, fighters were required to sign a waiver and acknowledge that the company was not making any guarantees about local hospital facilities’ capacities, ability to treat for the coronavirus, or whether going to the hospital would expose them to the coronavirus.  While some have questioned whether these waivers and non-disparagement documents would be enforceable, I would not be surprised to see similar documents become commonplace in sports as sporting events start to take place again.


The EEOC, ADA, & the Coronavirus

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) often provides guidance on a host of issues/statutes, so that employers and workers alike can have a general idea of how certain laws apply in a given situation.  The EEOC has maintained (and updated) a section of its website to provide guidance on how the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) applies in the age of the coronavirus. It is a good idea to check back with the EEOC frequently as this guidance is often updated.  In the meantime, this guidance provides readers with a general idea of how the ADA applies in the workplace while the coronavirus pandemic continues to play out.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations