Skip to main content

Five Chicago McDonald’s Workers File Suit Over Alleged PPE Shortcomings


On Tuesday, five Chicago McDonald’s workers filed suit and sought class action status over a claim they were not provided adequate personal protective equipment (“PPE”), were not allowed to social distance at work, and were not provided notice when coworkers tested positive for the coronavirus.

Readers will likely recall that sick outs and related strikes have been commonplace the past few months as workers across the country have sought better protections (or even just some protections) against contracting the coronavirus in the workplace.  In this particular suit, the workers at company owned and franchisee location McDonald’s claim that they were given masks to wear at work but routinely had to reuse the same ones.  Other workers apparently were not even given any PPE.  As well, while some managers were allowed to take time off, the workers claim they were not afforded the same leave nor were they allowed to take time off when coworkers tested positive for the coronavirus. 

The allegations have been disputed but something tells me the is likely the first of many coronavirus related suits against employers that we will see over the coming weeks and months.


For additional information:  https://www.chicagotribune.com/coronavirus/ct-coronavirus-chicago-mcdonalds-lawsuit-workers-ppe-20200519-far75d4tuvfehnhbmn2a4i4kzy-story.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie Vetoes Minimum Wage Hike

A few months ago, readers might remember that I pointed out that the New Jersey Legislature had voted to approve a minimum wage hike in the state .  Under the approved legislation, the minimum wage rate would rise to $10.10/hour in the next year and at least $15/hour over the next five.  (The current minimum wage rate in the state is $8.38/hour).  In that article, I had noted that the bill was then going to go before Governor Chris Christie for his approval or veto. As I had suggested previously, I thought that the Governor would likely veto the bill based upon his prior actions and comments on similar legislation.  Well, a few days ago, Governor Christie did just that and vetoed the bill on the grounds that it "would trigger an escalation of wages that will make doing business in New Jersey unfathomable."  Pointing to the increase in hourly minimum wage rates, the Governor referred to the bill as a "really radical increase."  (It is interesting to c...
Post a Comment
Read more