Skip to main content

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia Upholds State’s Right to Work Law


Last week, the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia issued its decision in Patrick Morrisey, Attorney General v. WV AFL-CIO, et al, and held that the state’s right to work law was constitutional.

Readers might recall that right to work laws prohibit union membership (and dues) as a condition of employment.  West Virginia’s right to work law, passed in 2016, had long been under fire from labor groups who sought to challenge its constitutionality.  After passage, the law was enjoined for a prolonged period of time.

In its arguments before the Supreme Court of Appeals, the plaintiffs (including the WV AFL-CIO) argued the law impermissibly restricted the association rights of unions, required an unconstitutional “taking” of unions’ property, and infringed upon the liberty interstate of unions under West Virginia’s constitution.  The Court was unswayed, however.  Of note, the Court pointed out that the state’s right to work law “operates to protect the right of workers to not be forced to associate against their will.”  Relying upon the United States Supreme Court’s 2018ruling in Janus v. AFSCME, the Court in this case recognized the importance of protecting the rights of workers to be free from financially supporting labor organizations whose views they do not share.  As well, the Court found that nothing in the right to work law required unions to represent non-dues paying employees.  Instead, federal law requires unions to represent employees when the union voluntarily chooses to represent all employees exclusively.

With the Court’s ruling last week, this paves the way for West Virginia’s law to take effect, much to the chagrin of labor groups.


For a copy of the Court’s decision:  http://www.courtswv.gov/supreme-court/docs/spring2020/19-0298b.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more