Skip to main content

Over 160 House Members Urge House Leadership to Provide Funding so NLRB Can Conduct Electronic Elections


Last week, House Representatives Andy Levin, Brian Fitzpatrick, and more than 160 other House members wrote a letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, urging that funding be provided to enable the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) to hold union elections electronically.

Readers will likely recall that union elections had been postponed a few weeks ago, when the coronavirus pandemic initially broke out. The NLRB indicated it was suspending elections for a few weeks as it did not believe it could safely oversee elections, given concerns over the health and safety of NLRB employees that would be required to be involved with any elections that occurred.  However, the NLRB had recently issued a press release stating that elections could begin again.

In the letter, the members of the House write that the NLRB has previously allowed electronic voting (allowing telephonic voting since 2002 and allowing internet voting since 2007.)  However, the members of the House suggested that the NLRB currently does not have the resources to conduct electronic elections and therefore asked House leadership to appropriate the necessary funds to allow this to happen.

I suspect that both Speaker Pelosi and Minority Leader McCarthy have other priorities to attend to right now (well, whenever the House returns to session that is.)  However, I would not be surprised if this request for funding made it into another stimulus bill at some point, given that there is at least some measure of bipartisan support for the matter, given the House members that joined in the letter.


For a copy of the letter:  https://andylevin.house.gov/sites/andylevin.house.gov/files/Letter%20re%20union%20electronic%20voting%20FINAL%204.19.20%20.pdf


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie Vetoes Minimum Wage Hike

A few months ago, readers might remember that I pointed out that the New Jersey Legislature had voted to approve a minimum wage hike in the state .  Under the approved legislation, the minimum wage rate would rise to $10.10/hour in the next year and at least $15/hour over the next five.  (The current minimum wage rate in the state is $8.38/hour).  In that article, I had noted that the bill was then going to go before Governor Chris Christie for his approval or veto. As I had suggested previously, I thought that the Governor would likely veto the bill based upon his prior actions and comments on similar legislation.  Well, a few days ago, Governor Christie did just that and vetoed the bill on the grounds that it "would trigger an escalation of wages that will make doing business in New Jersey unfathomable."  Pointing to the increase in hourly minimum wage rates, the Governor referred to the bill as a "really radical increase."  (It is interesting to c...
Post a Comment
Read more