Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


It was a busy few days in trial last week, out of the office at the start of the this week, and then in depositions and trials to end the week.  While I was on the road and away from home/my office most of the past week, I could not let a Friday go by without positing this “What I’ve Been Reading Tbis Week”.  After all, I strive to be on time with these posts, unlike the reporting of the Democratic caucus results out of Iowa.  (I could not help myself.  That might have been low hanging fruit, but I could not pass up the opportunity.)

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Flagstaff to Pay State of Arizona $840,000.00 As A Result of Higher Hourly Wage Rate

Well with every piece of good news, it is inevitable that there might be some bad news not far behind.  Take this news out of Arizona:  the hourly minimum rate in Flagstaff is $13/hour (while the state’s hourly wage rate is $12/hour.)   It goes without saying that is good news for hourly workers in Flagstaff.  However, as a result of a law passed last year, cities with hourly wage rates higher than the state’s are required to reimburse the state for costs associated with the higher wage rate.  Therefore, it is estimated that Flagstaff will owe the state at least $840,000.00 over the next two years (and perhaps more, depending upon final calculations.)


Democratic Presidential Candidate Tom Steyer Recognizes Campaign Union

This past Sunday, Democratic Presidential candidate Tom Steyer announced that a staff bargaining unit with International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 2325 had been recognized.  Readers might recall that other Democratic Presidential campaigns have unionized this election cycle, including the campaigns of Mayor Pete Buttigieg, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, and Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren.  As with the unionization of the other campaigns, I am not surprised that Steyer has chosen to voluntarily recognize the union (rather than requiring an election occur.)  Whether Steyer's candidacy makes it to (and through) Super Tuesday next month remains to be seen.


During State of the Union Address, President Trump Urges Passage of Paid Leave Bill

During Tuesday’s State of the Union address, President Donald Trump took a moment to voice his support for a paid leave bill that has recently been introduced in Congress, urging the Legislators in the House chamber to pass the legislation.  Republican Senator Bill Cassidy, one of the sponsors of the bill, noted his support of President Trump’s reference to the paid leave bill during the President’s address.  It is worth noting that The Advancing Working Families Act, the paid leave bill, has bipartisan support.  Whether that is enough to get the legislation passed remains to be seen.  However, President Trump appears ready to sign it, should it reach his desk.


Implementing Sexual Harassment in the Workplace...And Including Independent Contractors?

Kara Hertzog over at HRDive wrote an article in which she pointed out that while many employers have implemented sexual harassment training in the workplace (whether by choice or because of a new regulation or law), the question turns to whether employers should include independent contributors that training.  While every workplace is different, Hertzog recommends employers play it safe and include independent contractors in the training.  The article includes three suggestions on how employers can implement the training as well.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more