Skip to main content

Pennsylvania Increases Minimum Salary Threshold to Avoid Overtime Compensation For White Collar Workers


At the end of January, the Pennsylvania Independent Regulatory Review Commission adopted an amendment to increase the minimum salary threshold required to avoid overtime compensation for Executive, Administrative, and/or Professional workers ("EAP workers") in the state.

As some readers are likely aware, the Fair Labor Standards Act requires employees to be paid overtime for working more than 40 hours in a week.  However, there are several groups of employees that are exempt from this requirement, such as some white collar workers.  However, in order for this exemption to apply, for instance to EAP workers, employers must establish that the employees perform certain executive, administrative, or professional duties and that the employees receive a minimum weekly salary.  (Effective January 1st of this year, the minimum salary threshold went to $684/week or $35,658/annually.)

Under amendment approved earlier this year, the new minimum salary threshold is $684/week or $35,568/annually for employees in Pennsylvania.  Readers might recall that this mirrors the Labor Department's previously announced minimum salary threshold, stating that EAP workers are entitled to overtime pay unless they make $684/week or $35,568/annually.  However, there is a big difference between the Labor Department's version and the one that will take effect in Pennsylvania:  Beginning in 2021, the minimum salary threshold in Pennsylvania will rise to $780/week or $40,560/annually, and in 2022 to $875/week or $45,500/annually.  Subsequent increases could take place every three years thereafter, at a rate equal to the 10th percentile of Pennsylvania workers in the exempt EAP classification.  (The Labor Department's minimum salary threshold does not provide for future adjustments.)

Employers and employees alike in the state should take note of these changes.  After all, 2021 will be here before you know it.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more