Skip to main content

U.S. House Passes PRO Act


Last Thursday, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to approve the Protecting the Right to Organize Act (the “PRO Act”), an ambitious piece of pro-union legislation that Democrats are seeking to move through Congress.

One of the key parts of the PRO Act is it would scrap right to work laws in the approximately 27 states that have these laws in place.  (For those needing a refresher, right to work laws stipulate that workers cannot be forced to join a union as a condition of employment; however unions are still required to represent all employees during the collective bargaining process...including representation those employees that are not union members and do not pay union dues.)  Unions strongly oppose right to work laws and with Democrats now having majority control of the House, the expected vote on this legislation is not necessarily a surprise.

However, for those hoping the PRO Act makes it across the finish line, two things to consider:  1) the legislation will likely falter in the Senate where Republicans hold majority control and 2) there is no indication that President Donald Trump would sign the legislation, even if the Senate somehow managed to pass it.  With that being said, several Democratic Senators running for President, including Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren have voiced their support for the legislation.  Following the caucus last Monday in Iowa, might one of these candidates use their support of the PRO Act (especially now that it has moved over to the Senate for debate and a possible vote) to help boost their appeal to Democratic voters?


For additional information:  https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.natlawreview.com/article/congress-passes-labor-friendly-pro-act%3famp

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie Vetoes Minimum Wage Hike

A few months ago, readers might remember that I pointed out that the New Jersey Legislature had voted to approve a minimum wage hike in the state .  Under the approved legislation, the minimum wage rate would rise to $10.10/hour in the next year and at least $15/hour over the next five.  (The current minimum wage rate in the state is $8.38/hour).  In that article, I had noted that the bill was then going to go before Governor Chris Christie for his approval or veto. As I had suggested previously, I thought that the Governor would likely veto the bill based upon his prior actions and comments on similar legislation.  Well, a few days ago, Governor Christie did just that and vetoed the bill on the grounds that it "would trigger an escalation of wages that will make doing business in New Jersey unfathomable."  Pointing to the increase in hourly minimum wage rates, the Governor referred to the bill as a "really radical increase."  (It is interesting to c...
Post a Comment
Read more