Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


I think I probably spent more time in airports on layovers this week than I did in my actual office.  Unfortunately, that is sometimes what happens when trials and mediations are set rather far apart, a few days in a row.  While that left me little time to comb through articles this week, I think the two articles I highlighted below are well worth a read.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


A Primer On Statewide & Local Paid Sick Leave Laws in California

For those employers and employees in California (or those simply looking for a bit of information on the laws in the state), I refer you to this primer which provides a concise overview of the statewide and local paid sick leave laws.  This PDF chart includes information on which employees are covered, how much paid leave is provided for, how the leave can be accrued, whether the leave rolls over, etc., etc.  Even for those that have a good handle on these paid sick leave laws, it would not hurt to give this chart a review.


Effort Made to Rescind Waterloo's Ban the Box Measure

Earlier this week, City Councilwoman Margaret Klein moved to rescind a ban the box measure in Waterloo, Iowa.  The ban the box measure, approved by a 4 - 3 City Council vote back in November is set to take effect July 1, 2020.  The ban the box measure, the first of its kind in Iowa, prohibits city and private employers from asking about an applicant's criminal record until later in the hiring process.  Notably, a lawsuit had previously been filed to prevent enforcement of the ban the box measure on the grounds that it violated a 2017 Iowa law that prohibited cities from adopting ordinances that "exceed or conflict with the requirements of federal or state law...relating to hiring practices."  It is expected this challenge will be heard by the City Council shortly and would certainly be a development to keep an eye on in the coming weeks.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more