Skip to main content

The Great EEOC Roundup: January Edition


As always, there are some EEOC cases that jump out at me when I review developments on that front.  Below are a couple EEOC cases and settlements that caught my eye this month.


Rainbow USA, Inc. to Pay $11,000.00 to Settle Pregnancy Discrimination Claim

Earlier this month, it was announced that Rainbow USA, Inc. ("Rainbow") had agreed to pay $11,000.00 to settle a pregnancy discrimination claim, filed by a former employee.  According to the EEOC lawsuit, Rainbow indefinitely suspended a pregnant junior assistant manager and subsequently terminated her two days after learning of her pregnancy related restrictions.  This alleged conduct is in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as well as the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978.  As always, I would suggest employers use this announced settlement (and the following settlements) as a reminder of what types of conduct is in violation of federal law.


Hawaii Medical Service Association to Pay $180,000.00 to Settle Disability Discrimination Claim

Hawaii Medical Service Association ("HMSA"), a health insurance company in Hawaii, has agreed to pay $180,000.00 to resolve a disability discrimination claim.  The lawsuit revolved around a claim that HMSA violated the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") when the company decided to not allow intermittent leave as a possible accommodation for employees with disabilities (in its customer relations department.)  HMSA was also alleged to have not engaged in the interactive process with its employees to determine if there were other accommodations available for them.  As a result, the disable employees were apparently forced to either work without an accommodation or resign.  This alleged conduct is in violation of the ADA, which prohibits employers from discriminating against (and not engaging in the interactive process) with disabled employees.


Greensboro Zaxby's Franchisee to Pay $30,000.00 to Settle Sexual Harassment & Retaliation Claim

A Greensboro Zaxby's franchisee has agreed to pay $30,000.00 to settle a sexual harassment and retaliation claim, following allegations that the restaurant's general manager made sexually inappropriate comments and requests for sex with a female cashier on an almost daily basis.  After complaining about the conduct, the cashier was terminated.  This alleged conduct is in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which prohibits employers from allowing a sexually hostile work environment to exist and from taking any retaliatory action against an employee that complains about the misconduct.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more