Skip to main content

With the House Set to Vote on the Raise the Wage Act, the US Chamber of Commerce Backs A Wage Hike (With Caveats)


Readers might have heard of a bill introduced in the Democratic controlled House of Representatives, the Raise the Wage Act.  This bill would do several things:  1) it would more than double the federal minimum wage rate up to $15/hour over approximately five years; 2) index future wage hikes to median wage growth; and 3) do away with the tipped minimum wage rate.  While there was some disagreement among Democrats in the House about the precise language of the Raise the Wage Act, there has been a gradual coalescing of Democrats around the legislation.  (For the most part, Republicans have criticized the bill as being too extreme in terms of the overall wage hike and the time period over which it would occur.)

With that being said, the US Chamber of Commerce recently announced that it would throw its support behind a wage hike...with a few caveats.  (It would make too much sense for the Chamber to suddenly back the legislation, right?)  In a letter to the House of Representatives, Neil Bradley, the Executive Vice President at the Chamber, pointed out that a recent report found that a federal minimum wage hike to $15/hour would be too dramatic and lead to a notable loss in jobs.  With that being said, Bradley did state that the Chamber would support a "double digit" increase to the federal minimum wage if:  1) the legislation benefited both employers and employees; 2) allow de minimis use of employer provided electronic devices outside of working hours (which would not require the employer to compensate the employee); 3) update an exemption for outside sales; and 4) clarify the Fair Labor Standards Act to ensure that state or local minimum wage hikes are fairly applied to franchises.

Now bear in mind, I doubt there will be widespread acceptance of these proposals by Democrats.  Instead, Republicans will likely rally around these proposals and once rejected by Democrats, point out that attempts were made to find an amicable middle ground to get a new federal minimum wage approved.  Democrats appear to have the votes to get this bill approved in the House, which many expect will happen within the next few weeks.  The next stop would then be getting it approved by the Senate...which is controlled by Republicans.  If by some surprise, the Republican controlled Senate approved the bill, it would go before President Donald Trump.  As many expect, in the unlikely event this bill makes it that far, President Trump is expected to veto it.  At that point, it is unlikely that the Senate has a 2/3 majority to override that veto.

Now if a lower federal minimum wage hike were approved by Congress, it is possible President Trump might consider signing it into law.  After all, there have been some indications that he would approve an increase in the federal minimum wage (just not up to $15/hour.)


For a copy of the Raise the Wage Act of 2019 (HR 582):  https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/582/text

For a copy of the letter from the US Chamber of Commerce:  https://www.uschamber.com/letters-congress/us-chamber-letter-hr-582-the-raise-the-wage-act

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per