Skip to main content

Breaking: Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta Resigns


Stop the presses!  This morning, President Donald Trump announced that Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta was resigning and would formally step down next week.  The announcement was made on the White House South Lawn this morning in which both President Trump and Secretary Acosta appeared.  Secretary Acosta was the first Labor Secretary under President Trump and had served in the role since 2017.

Readers might be wondering why Secretary Acosta is resigning after a relatively smooth past few years at the Department of Labor.  For those unaware, Secretary Acosta had been a bit embattled in recent months over a 2008 plea deal he negotiated with Jeffrey Epstein while Acosta served as a US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida.  The plea deal was a non-prosecutorial agreement whereby the federal government agreed to halt a federal sex abuse investigation against Epstein in return for Epstein pleading guilty to a lesser offense.  That plea deal was criticized by many as being overly lenient and enabled Epstein to avoid a potentially more severe punishment.  

Following Epstein’s recent arrest, increased attention was put on that 2008 plea deal with many Democrats calling for Secretary Acosta’s resignation.  Secretary Acosta recently held a press conference in which he defended his actions and appeared to assuage concerns in the White Hoise about the criticism.  However, it appears that press conference did not resolve the matter, given the unexpected resignation announcement this morning.

It is worth noting that President Trump indicated the resignation was voluntarily given and praised Secretary Acosta for his work at the Department of Labor.  At this point, it is too early to predict who will be nominated to fill the vacant Labor Secretary position.  I would keep an eye on this over the coming weeks as a new nominee will likely be put forth shortly.


For additional information:  https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1029226

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more