Skip to main content

Predictive Scheduling Ordinance Introduced in Los Angeles City Council


Late last week, three members of the Los Angeles City Council announced a proposed ordinance that would provide many retail workers in the city with a predictive work schedule.  Under the proposal, employees at retail businesses with 300 or more employees would have the right to written and posted work schedules, two weeks’ notice of their work schedules, the ability to request a flexible schedule and the right to decline work hours without retaliation from their employer, predictably in pay (by requiring employers to provide a ‘good faith’ estimate of weekly work hours at the time of hire), the right to at least 10 free hours between shifts (so as to not have to close and then open the next morning), and access to additional work hours.

The crux of much of the support for the ordinance can be summed up by City Council President Herb Wesson:  “A retail job may not be a traditional 9-5, but these workers deserve scheduling consistency from their employers.  If you don’t know when or how often you’ll be working week-to-week, it’s impossible to plan for your day-to-day life.”  This ordinance seeks to remedy these concerns by providing retail workers in the city with the above referenced protections.

It is expected that once the city attorney drafts the precise wording of this predictive scheduling ordinance, business groups and employers will mobilize against it.  It is worth noting that while some cities in the state have already approved similar measures, a statewide ordinance has not managed to pass.  I find this to be somewhat surprising, given the employee friendly nature of the Legislature in California.  (After all, the state has previously approved a statewide $15/hour minimum wage rate for all hourly employees in the state by 2023, and Los Angeles has previously approved a progressive minimum wage hike for hourly workers in the city.). For the time being, labor advocates seeking a statewide predictive scheduling law will likely have to settle for these ‘incremental’ victories at the local level, until the Legislature can find enough support for a statewide predictive scheduling law.  With that being said, while this ordinance that has been introduced in the Los Angeles City Council is no sure thing, if I were a betting man, I would expect it will likely find enough support to pass sooner rather than later.


For additional information:  https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-retail-scheduling-20190302-story.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more