Skip to main content

Republican Senator Mike Lee’s Opposition to EEOC Nominee Threatens to Throw Commission Into Chaos


While a threatened federal government shutdown has garnered a lot of attention lately, Utah Senator Mike Lee’s opposition to an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) nominee, Chai Feldblum (Feldblum”), threatens to throw the EEOC into chaos by the start of next year.

Feldblum, currently one of five EEOC Commissioners, has a term that ends at 11:59 PM on December 31st.  President Donald Trump has nominated her for another term, after she was nominated by President Barack Obama and confirmed by the Senate in 2010.  (The party that holds the presidency nominates three EEOC Commissioners, the minority party nominates the other two.  In this case, Democrats chose Feldblum to again serve another term and President Trump put her up for nomination before the Senate.  This is common, notwithstanding political climate in Washington, DC as of late).  The Senate usually fast tracks the process and confirms EEOC nominees as a group, often with unanimous approval by Republicans and Democrats.

This year, however, Senator Lee has taken a vocal opposition to Feldblum’s nomination as he seeks to block it.  His reasoning?  He has argued that Feldblum’s position on marriage and LBGTQ matters should prevent her from being confirmed for another term.  (Feldblum is the first openly gay EEOC Commissioner).  Senator Lee has further suggested that as Commissioner, Feldblum would seek to “use the might of the government to stamp out traditional marriage supporters.”

So that begs the question:  Now what?  Let us break things down here:

  1. If Feldblum (and the two other nominees also awaiting confirmation) are not confirmed by the Senate by the start of the new year, the EEOC will be left with only two Commissioners which is insufficient to establish a quorum.  Without a quorum, the EEOC would be unable to conduct business as usual, such as not being able to issue guidance documents, file amicus briefs, and be unable to hire expert witnesses for cases, among other matter (which critics of Senator Lee say is untenable, especially in the midst of the #MeToo movement and ongoing fight against sexual assault in the workplace).  This option would only prolong the stalemate and draw unwanted attention to the matter, mainly for Republicans if the general public coalesced around the idea that Senator Lee’s opposition was unreasonable.
  2. Another option is for Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to put the nomination up for a regular confirmation vote   While Republicans have majority control of the Senate, Democrats think they have the votes to have Feldblum confirmed, as Republicans have voted to confirm her previously.  If this were to happen, it likely would not garner the intense interest that current Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh received before the Senate as a judicial nominee earlier this year.  However, this option ultimately requires Senator McConnell to act quickly, which is not guaranteed given the limited time left before the end of the year and other legislative matters likely ahead of this on the Majority Leader’s to do list.
  3. Alternatively, Democrats could choose to not proceed with Feldblum’s nomination and instead select someone else.  However, Democrats and LGBTQ advocates caution that doing so would set a bad precedent of allowing one Senator to dictate EEOC nominations going forward, in contrast with the traditional bipartisan support for Republican and Democratic EEOC Commissioner nominees in the past.  Unless the general public started calling for Democrats to stand down and withdraw Feldblum’s nomination, I do not see this is a realistic option.
  4. With that being said, Senator Lee could stand down himself and withdraw his opposition to Feldblum’s nomination.  An exchange of sorts, perhaps Senator Lee not opposing Feldblum’s nomination in exchange for Democrats not opposing a nominee of Republicans is a truce that could be arranged.  This is a realistic resolution to the matter as I think Senate Republicans would rally around the proposal in order to get one of their own nominees (to the NLRB or to a Circuit Court, for instance) confirmed.
With that being said, this is a developing situation to keep a close eye on during the next few weeks leading into January.


For additional information:  https://www.vox.com/2018/12/17/18140798/lgbt-eeoc-mike-lee-chai-feldblum-discrimination

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more