Skip to main content

Breaking: National Right to Work Legislation Proposed


Earlier today, House Republicans introduced a bill that would institute right to work in cities and states across the country.  Readers might recall that several states have been proactive about passing right to work legislation over the past few months (such as West Virginia, Kentucky, Missouri, and New Hampshire...to name a few), but a national right to work bill would have a much larger impact.

The bill, sponsored by Representatives Joe Wilson (South Carolina) and Steve King (Iowa), would amend the National Labor Relations Act and the Railway Labor Act and prohibit provisions in employment agreements that would require all employees to join a union (or pay union dues) as a condition of employment.  Although a similar bill filed in the 114th Legislative Session failed to gain traction, this bill *might* prove differently.  In this Legislative Session, Republicans control both houses of Congress and have a Republican President who has indicated his support for right to work laws in the past.

Of course, Republicans do not have a "filibuster proof" majority, should Democrats seek to block the legislation.  I would fully expect labor unions, labor union supporters, and a strong majority of Democrats to vehemently oppose this legislation.  At this point, unless Republicans can convince enough Democrats to support this bill (I would not hold my breath) or overcome a filibuster (possible, but again, still difficult), this bill might end up being little more than a dream for the time being.

As with many upcoming fights expected to play out in Congress (such as the nomination of Andy Puzder for Labor Secretary), something tells me this will turn into a protracted and drawn out fight.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more