Skip to main content

Proposed Right to Work Amendment Coming to Virginia Ballots On November 8th


In a few short weeks, voters in Virginia (and four other states) will make decisions that will impact the right to work law in the state.  For those not familiar with right to work, these laws protect employees from being required to join a union, while also allowing non-union employees to benefit from collective bargaining or negotiating done by a union.  Critics of right to work have routinely called these laws an attack on unions and enable non-union members to take advantage of the work unions do without having to pay union dues.

Virginia, a right to work state since 1947, has a proposed state constitutional amendment ballot initiative that voters will decide upon November 8th.  The proposed ballot initiative would essentially strengthen the existing right to work law already in place by amending the state constitution and placing the right to work law in the constitution.  Note, at this time, the right to work law in Virginia exists by way of statute.  In theory, at any point, the state legislature could vote to amend or repeal that portion of the statute and do away with the right to work law.  However, should this ballot initiative pass and right to work be written into Virginia's constitution, that would make it tougher to repeal.  In order to change a constitutional amendment, another constitutional amendment would have to be approved through two separate General Assembly sessions and then approved by voters.  It goes without saying, that is no small task...

To the surprise of few, labor unions have actively been engaged in recent weeks in a coordinated effort to defeat this ballot initiative.  At this time, Virginia appears to be favoring Hillary Clinton for President.  The common thought is those more liberal minded voters would likely vote against this proposed ballot initiative as well...but time will tell.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie Vetoes Minimum Wage Hike

A few months ago, readers might remember that I pointed out that the New Jersey Legislature had voted to approve a minimum wage hike in the state .  Under the approved legislation, the minimum wage rate would rise to $10.10/hour in the next year and at least $15/hour over the next five.  (The current minimum wage rate in the state is $8.38/hour).  In that article, I had noted that the bill was then going to go before Governor Chris Christie for his approval or veto. As I had suggested previously, I thought that the Governor would likely veto the bill based upon his prior actions and comments on similar legislation.  Well, a few days ago, Governor Christie did just that and vetoed the bill on the grounds that it "would trigger an escalation of wages that will make doing business in New Jersey unfathomable."  Pointing to the increase in hourly minimum wage rates, the Governor referred to the bill as a "really radical increase."  (It is interesting to c...