Skip to main content

Breaking: Injunction Issued to Halt Implementation of Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Rule


Recently, Associated Builders and Contractors (and national trade associations) brought suit in Texas to challenge the implementation of the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces rule.  This rule, which has also been referred to as the "Blacklisting Rule" would require that contractors who seek federal work to disclose recent labor law violations.  This rule arises out of Executive Order No. 13673 (issued by President Barack Obama on July 30, 2016) which was designed to achieve sweeping labor law reforms.  The Obama administration's goal with the Blacklisting Rule was to withhold government contracts from employers with a history of violations.  Opponents of the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces rule argued that it violated contractors' First Amendment rights and would restrict open competition for federal contracts by forcing companies to disclose allegations of unadjudicated labor and employment law violations.  

Late Monday, Judge Marcia Crone from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, issued a nationwide injunction which halts the implementation of the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces rule (which was set to go into effect on October 25, 2016 for employers with federal contracts of $50 million or more and next April for employers with federal contracts of $500,000.00 or more).  In Judge Crone's ruling, she held that the Associated Builders and Contractors (who brought suit originally) had "properly demonstrated immediate and ongoing injury to their members if the rule is allowed to take effect."  

However, note that the only area where the injunction was not granted was the "Paycheck Transparency" provision which would require contractors and subcontractors to provide employees with documentation of regular and overtime hours worked, pay and additions to or deductions from pay that are not currently included in employee paychecks.  The Paycheck Transparency provision will go into effect on January 1, 2017.

It goes without saying that this is quite a development.  Interesting to see how this one plays out, now that the injunction has been issued.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more