Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


It has been an extremely busy couple of weeks in and out of the office.  As a result, this is a shorter post than I would have preferred...but I have had less time than normal to read through articles as I would have liked.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


NLRB Criticized For Enabling Racially and Sexually Demeaning Misconduct By Striking Workers

Recently, D.C. Circuit Judge Patricia Millett authored an opinion (and wrote a concurring opinion) in which he criticized the NLRB for its "too-often cavalier and enabling approach" to racially and sexually demeaning misconduct by employees on strike.  Readers might remember a law passed in Pennsylvania last year which removed the "labor dispute" exemption for unions...which addressed similar bad behavior as this case.  Interesting to note a high ranking judge take aim at the NLRB for giving "refuge" to conduct that she labeled as being "not only intolerable by any standard of decency, but also illegal in every corner of the workplace."  Marcia Coyle has a great analysis of Judge Millett's criticism of the NLRB that I think readers would enjoy reading.



Dcist.com has an in depth look at the impact that paid sick leave has had:   In cities that guarantee paid sick leave, there has been a 5% drop in the rates of the flu and other contagious illnesses.  This article is well worth a read for those interested to see the positive impact that paid sick leave has been shown to have.



For those interested in equal pay matters, look no further.  Rebecca Shabad over at CBS News has one of the best researched articles on the topic that I can recall.  In the article, Shabad tracks equal pay developments from around the country (including measures that have become law in Maryland in Massachusetts recently) while also recognizing the continued struggle to finally achieve equal pay in the workplace across the entire country.  It goes without saying that while a lot of progress has been made, there is quite a bit left to accomplish.


Ohio Supreme Court Dismisses Minimum Wage Complaint

Leila Atassi over at Cleveland.com has an update on the Ohio Supreme Court's recent ruling on September 14th that dismissed a complaint filed by backers of a $15/hour minimum wage rate in Cleveland.  According to the Court, the case was dismissed as the issue is not yet ripe for review.  For those looking for a less "legalese" explanation:  The complaint asked the Court to require the Cleveland City Council to accept 18,0000 signatures that had not been considered (the signatures were gather to try and get the $15/hour minimum wage matter on the ballot this November).  However, that did not happen so a special election is currently set for May 2, 2017 in which voters will have the opportunity to vote on whether to raise minimum wage rates in the city.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...