Skip to main content

New Laws for 2016: "Labor Dispute" Exemption for Unions Removed (PA)


Recently, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf signed a bill into law that repealed a loophole that gave unions the right to stalk, harass, and even use a "weapon of mass destruction" if they were involved in a labor dispute in Pennsylvania, without fear of being charged with one of those three crimes.

In the past, it had been well documented that unions harassed the children and spouses of business executives with violent taunts and even death threats.  A company official involved in a labor dispute in Philadelphia said that union workers had videotaped her children at sports events and threatened to shoot her.  A company executive for another company was talked by union workers.  When she went to a restaurant, she was taunted and threatened that she would be shot. 

However, under the law at the time, these business people had no legal recourse to prevent the harassment or have those who perpetrated the crimes arrested.  In the instance of the executive who was stalked and taunted at the restaurant, her case was thrown out because of the loopholes.  In fact, the judge said "When you walk in, as a vice president of a company, to a restaurant full of union workers, you're going to hear some things you should have expected to hear."  Well true, I might expect to be taunted and have someone threaten to shoot me if I am a company executive involved in a labor dispute.  But call me crazy, but I would expect to have some legal rights if I was physically threatened.  I do not think that is asking too much...

Under this new law, employers and employees alike would be protected from these type of hostile work environment situations and threatening tactics, as the law intends that the exemptions previously in place would not apply in labor disputes. 

Unsurprisingly, the Pennsylvania chapter of the AFL-CIO has opposed the measure as anti-worker.  Yes, you read that right.  Apparently these loopholes are pro-worker, in the minds of some.


For additional information:  https://www.governor.pa.gov/governor-wolf-signs-bill-removing-exemptions-for-labor-disputes/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more