Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


I had a very short week in the office with a lot of out of town work trips.  As a result, I had less time than I would have liked to read through some labor & employment law articles.  With that being said, I came across a great note on dealing with employee handbook acknowledgments that I think readers would find helpful.  

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


A Few Helpful Suggestions on Employee Handbook Acknowledgments

Eric Meyer has some helpful suggestions on employee handbooks, in particular as it relates to the acknowledgment portion.  Granted, every situation is different and every suggestion might not apply, but this article is worth a review for those in HR or those who deal with employee handbooks on a routine basis.


Donald Trump Expresses Support For a Change in Minimum Wage Rate

Readers might remember a post from a few weeks ago that I wrote on where the (then) 5 remaining Presidential candidates stood on the minimum wage issue.  I had mentioned that many of the candidates would likely change their positions as they shifted to the general election in order to appeal to more voters.  Well, earlier this week, The New York Times posted an article in which Donald Trump stated he was "open to doing something with" the minimum wage.  While there were no specifics given, this stands in stark contrast to his comments during the primary when he had mentioned the minimum wage was too high.  Interesting to see how this plays out.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...