Skip to main content

Uber Settles Two Class Action Lawsuits


Recently, it was announced that Uber had agreed to pay nearly $100 million to drivers to settle two class action lawsuits filed against the company.  Those suits involved disputes over whether Uber drivers were improperly characterized as independent contractors rather than employees.  The class actions argued the drivers were entitled to reimbursements for overtime, fuel, maintenance expenses, and tip money that they alleged had been withheld by the company.  I thought this would be a good time to highlight these cases so readers have an idea of the magnitude of this settlement.



Uber's Statement on the Settlement of the Two Class Action Lawsuits

Direct from Uber's Newsroom, there is a press release which breaks down the agreed upon settlement with specifics on what Uber will pay (and provide to its drivers) to settle the case.  For those looking for a quick reference on what is being settled, this is a good place to start.


Uber Settles Suits & Prevails...At Least For This Round

Erik Sherman has a good overview of how the settlement of the two suits against Uber will likely amount to a "win" for the company...for the time being.  The settlement, which still has to be approved by the court, is for a potential $100 million ($84 million now with an additional $16 million if Uber goes public and its valuation grows an additional 50% in the first year).  Given that the number of drivers impacted by these suits is around 385,000 (and it would amount to an average payout of $145/driver), Uber is able to avoid a potentially much larger payout had this case been tried in court.  

With this settlement, Uber has managed to push the dispute over its identification of its drivers as independent contractors rather than employees down the road...for now.  As Sherman writes, this is the biggest win for Uber with this settlement.  But I certainly do not think this is the last we have heard of the independent contractor vs. employee dispute when it comes to ride sharing workers.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie Vetoes Minimum Wage Hike

A few months ago, readers might remember that I pointed out that the New Jersey Legislature had voted to approve a minimum wage hike in the state .  Under the approved legislation, the minimum wage rate would rise to $10.10/hour in the next year and at least $15/hour over the next five.  (The current minimum wage rate in the state is $8.38/hour).  In that article, I had noted that the bill was then going to go before Governor Chris Christie for his approval or veto. As I had suggested previously, I thought that the Governor would likely veto the bill based upon his prior actions and comments on similar legislation.  Well, a few days ago, Governor Christie did just that and vetoed the bill on the grounds that it "would trigger an escalation of wages that will make doing business in New Jersey unfathomable."  Pointing to the increase in hourly minimum wage rates, the Governor referred to the bill as a "really radical increase."  (It is interesting to c...
Post a Comment
Read more