Skip to main content

Updated: Cincinnati Bengals Cheerleader Lawsuit Tentatively Settles


Last week, it was announced that the class action wage and hour lawsuit filed by a Cincinnati Bengals cheerleader (note, the cheerleaders are called "Ben-Gals"...well played) had been settled.  Readers might remember that last March, a class action wage and hour lawsuit was filed against the team.  (From Pom Poms to the Courtroom, Pt. 2 - Cincinnati Bengals Edition).  In that suit, it was alleged that the team paid the cheerleaders less than minimum wage for their work.  In fact, the suit claimed that the cheerleaders worked about 300 hours a year and were paid, "at most, $90 for each home football game."  For those readers are not math majors, that is equivalent to about $2.85 per hour.  

In the documents filed with the Court, the settlement reached provides that the Bengals will pay the Ben-Gal cheerleaders a total of $255,000.00 to settle.  For those covered by this class action suit, those cheerleaders who cheered for the team in the 2011 - 2013 seasons could receive at least $2,500.00 each, per season.  As any good defense attorney would advise their client, the Bengals denied any wrongdoing and simply decided to settle the suit to avoid protracted (and likely expensive) litigation.  The cheerleader who brought the suit, Alexa Brenneman, will receive an extra $5,000.00, since she was the lead plaintiff in this suit.

At this point, the settlement is approval, pending a December 3 hearing.  As well, the Bengals can cancel the settlement if cheerleaders with a combination of six years or more opt out of the settlement.  That means that if two cheerleaders with three years of experience each (who cheered during the covered time frame) choose not to sign off on the agreement, the Bengals could cancel the whole thing.  

This case is not over yet...but we are close to seeing this one wrap up.  Stay tuned.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more