Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


This was a tough week to narrow down the articles I wanted to highlight.  One of the more enjoyable notes I came across dealt with some rather "unusual" California Labor Code requirements.  Maybe unusual is not the right word...but I will say these are parts of the Labor Code that many might not have seen before or reviewed in a while.  Well worth a quick glance.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


A Closer Look at Making Unlimited Time Off Actually Work

Ashley Speagle has a great article on how the recent announcements by several companies of unlimited time off or unlimited parental leave can actually end up working.  She has some good thoughts on instituting clear expectations and rules to ensure everyone is on the same page and even changing the "unlimited" language in policies to include "minimums".  


Bernie Sanders Joins Fight For 15 Ahead of Pope's Visit to D.C.

This is a good article from The Hill which makes note of Bernie Sanders taking part in a Fight for 15 strike, in an attempt to get Pope Francis to address their fight for an increased minimum wage.  The hope of these protesters is that while the Pope is in D.C., he will take up their cause and advocate for a higher minimum wage.  Time will tell if this actually works, but it cannot hurt to have a high profile name join the cause, right?

Beware What Is Put In Writing...That Can Come Back to Bite You

Robin Shea wrote a very interesting note on two attorneys who got in a dispute over a date to schedule an on-site inspection in a worker injury lawsuit.  In this instance, the date set for the inspection was September 14, which occurs during the Jewish New Year celebration.  However, this date was supposed to be September 10 and was inadvertently transcribed on the letter as September 14.  The other attorney, who was Jewish, became incensed at this date and sent a nasty graham to the other attorney and accused him of being "despicable, ignominious, cowardly, and a morally bankrupt racist."  The attorney who received this letter then went and asked the Court to sanction the other attorney for his conduct and somewhat slanderous language.  Even though the Court did not sanction any party in this case, employers and employees alike should be aware:  Anything that is put in writing can come back to bite you...especially when personal insults are leveled.


A Few California Labor Codes to Remember

The Laconic Law Blog always has some good notes and insights; this one being no exception.  As Eric Welter notes, there are several California Labor Code requirements that many probably are not aware of.  These are a few good ones to review!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more