Skip to main content

Governor Scott Walker Proposes Sweeping Changes to the Union Landscape


Recently, Republican Governor Scott Walker of Wisconsin proposed several changes to curb the power of unions in a proposed policy change that would be implemented if he were elected President.  For those who do not know, Governor Walker has battled unions in Wisconsin since becoming Governor a few years ago.  With his poll numbers sliding in his campaign for President, he has gone back to the well and focused on one of the topics he is more comfortable addressing (and has had a record of success).

Perhaps the most important changes in Walker's proposal include:  Making it illegal for federal employees to join a union; extending right to work laws across the country; and eliminating the National Labor Relations Board.


Eliminate Unions for Federal Employees

As for his proposal to eliminate unions for federal employees, Walker noted that in 2012, taxpayers apparently subsidized 3,395,187 hours of "official time" government union lobbying, including time spent negotiating collective bargaining agreements.  Walker stated that as Governor, he had seen the (negative) impact that big government unions have had on the government's ability to work on behalf of taxpayers.  Consequently, Walker's proposal to eliminate unions for federal employees is based upon the ideal that it would bring power back to the individual workers, rather than placing it in the hands of big unions.  

Extend Right to Work Laws Across the Country

Under Walker's proposal, he would change the default position in federal law to be Right to Work for all private, state, and local public sector workers.  In a concession of sorts, however, Walker indicated that states could affirmatively vote to opt out of Right to Work status.    

Eliminate the National Labor Relations Board

This is one of the parts of the proposal that caught me somewhat by surprise.  Walker pointed out that that Board has become a one sided advocate for "big-labor special interests."  To those who follow the NLRB, it is no surprise that is has become politicized over the years, depending upon the makeup of the Board & who appointed the Board members.  As Walker pointed out, in his opinion, the Board is beyond repair and should be eliminated. In its place, Walker would transfer the NLRB's oversight and administration of union elections, as well as the Board's role in addressing unfair labor practices, to the National Mediation Board.  (Not familiar with the National Mediation Board?  Check it out here:  http://www.nmb.gov/). 


Time will tell whether these proposals give Walker any traction on the national level.  For the time being, however, it is likely to energize his core supporters (as Walker is the toughest anti-union candidate running for President) yet also antagonize his opposition. 


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

Senator Bernie Sanders To Introduce Bill Requiring Large Corporations To Pay For Federal Assistance Programs

Next week, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is set to introduce legislation which would require large employers such as Walmart, Amazon, and McDonald's to fully cover the cost of food stamps, public housing, Medicaid, and other federal assistance programs that their employees receive.  Senator Sanders has stated that the goal is to force these large employers to pay their employees a living wage and cut back on the nearly $150 billion in taxpayer dollars that go toward funding these federal programs every year. As for the specifics, a 100% tax on government benefits received would be imposed on government benefits received by workers at companies with 500 or more employees.  For instance, if a Walmart employee received $500 in food stamps, Walmart would be taxed $500. To call this proposed legislation groundbreaking would be an understatement.  I would expect that Senator Sanders, an Independent that caucuses with Democrats, is going to face an uphill battle gett...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations