Skip to main content

Your Boss Stresses You Out & You Claim It Is a Disability? Might Want to Reconsider That Disability Discrimination Claim


Higgins-Williams v. Sutter Medical Foundation - California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District


Facts:  Michaelin Higgins-Williams ("Higgins-Williams") worked as a clinical assistant in Sutter's Shared Services Department.  Higgins-Williams reported to her treating physician that she was stressed because of her interactions with human resources and her manager.  After her physician diagnosed her with "adjustment disorder with anxiety", Sutter granted Higgins-Williams a stress related leave of absence for about 30 days.  

After Higgins-Williams returned to work, she received a negative performance evaluation and had additional conflicts with her manager.  Not long after, Higgins-Williams submitted a disability accommodation request form and sought to transfer to a different department and obtain an additional leave of absence.  After additional leaves of absence that last almost a year, Sutter terminated Higgins-Williams.

Higgins-Williams subsequently filed suit against Sutter and alleged disability discrimination, wrongful termination and other related claims.  The trial court granted Sutter's motion for summary judgment.

Holding:  In considering Higgins-Williams' appeal, the Court of Appeal first looked to what disabilities were recognized in California's Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA").  In this instance, Higgins-Williams alleged she suffered from an anxiety and stress induced disability as a result of her supervisor.  However, the Court was quick to rely upon prior caselaw which held that "an employee's inability to work under a particular supervisor because of anxiety and stress related to the supervisor's standard oversight of the employee's job performance does not constitute a disability under FEHA. 

Judgment:  The California Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Sutter on the grounds that Higgins-Williams was not disabled, as recognized under the Fair Employment and Housing Act, simply because of her inability to work under a particular supervisor because of anxiety and stress related to the supervisor's oversight of Higgins-Williams' work.

The Takeaway:  Employees, let this case be a reminder to you:  Just because your boss/supervisor stresses you out and causes you some anxiety does not mean you are necessarily disabled and have a valid disability discrimination claim if you are terminated.  I think it is safe to say that we have all had a boss at one point or another who caused us to lose sleep, get our blood pressure up, etc.  However, that alone does not necessarily mean a disability discrimination claim exists.  If that were the case, I think the courts would be even more overrun than they already are...

Majority Opinion Judge:  Judge Butz

Date:  May 26, 2015

Opinion:  https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCEQFjAAahUKEwi5uMC12oXHAhUQD5IKHQm8D5k&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.courts.ca.gov%2Fopinions%2Fdocuments%2FC073677.PDF&ei=H5e7VfmsDZCeyASJ-L7ICQ&usg=AFQjCNFgg87XaAnwK_6FFOBGa6vNhtb_lg&sig2=aF0lEtRr0eoMMxytcK9eOA&bvm=bv.99261572,d.aWw

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie Vetoes Minimum Wage Hike

A few months ago, readers might remember that I pointed out that the New Jersey Legislature had voted to approve a minimum wage hike in the state .  Under the approved legislation, the minimum wage rate would rise to $10.10/hour in the next year and at least $15/hour over the next five.  (The current minimum wage rate in the state is $8.38/hour).  In that article, I had noted that the bill was then going to go before Governor Chris Christie for his approval or veto. As I had suggested previously, I thought that the Governor would likely veto the bill based upon his prior actions and comments on similar legislation.  Well, a few days ago, Governor Christie did just that and vetoed the bill on the grounds that it "would trigger an escalation of wages that will make doing business in New Jersey unfathomable."  Pointing to the increase in hourly minimum wage rates, the Governor referred to the bill as a "really radical increase."  (It is interesting to c...
Post a Comment
Read more