Skip to main content

Your Boss Stresses You Out & You Claim It Is a Disability? Might Want to Reconsider That Disability Discrimination Claim


Higgins-Williams v. Sutter Medical Foundation - California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District


Facts:  Michaelin Higgins-Williams ("Higgins-Williams") worked as a clinical assistant in Sutter's Shared Services Department.  Higgins-Williams reported to her treating physician that she was stressed because of her interactions with human resources and her manager.  After her physician diagnosed her with "adjustment disorder with anxiety", Sutter granted Higgins-Williams a stress related leave of absence for about 30 days.  

After Higgins-Williams returned to work, she received a negative performance evaluation and had additional conflicts with her manager.  Not long after, Higgins-Williams submitted a disability accommodation request form and sought to transfer to a different department and obtain an additional leave of absence.  After additional leaves of absence that last almost a year, Sutter terminated Higgins-Williams.

Higgins-Williams subsequently filed suit against Sutter and alleged disability discrimination, wrongful termination and other related claims.  The trial court granted Sutter's motion for summary judgment.

Holding:  In considering Higgins-Williams' appeal, the Court of Appeal first looked to what disabilities were recognized in California's Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA").  In this instance, Higgins-Williams alleged she suffered from an anxiety and stress induced disability as a result of her supervisor.  However, the Court was quick to rely upon prior caselaw which held that "an employee's inability to work under a particular supervisor because of anxiety and stress related to the supervisor's standard oversight of the employee's job performance does not constitute a disability under FEHA. 

Judgment:  The California Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Sutter on the grounds that Higgins-Williams was not disabled, as recognized under the Fair Employment and Housing Act, simply because of her inability to work under a particular supervisor because of anxiety and stress related to the supervisor's oversight of Higgins-Williams' work.

The Takeaway:  Employees, let this case be a reminder to you:  Just because your boss/supervisor stresses you out and causes you some anxiety does not mean you are necessarily disabled and have a valid disability discrimination claim if you are terminated.  I think it is safe to say that we have all had a boss at one point or another who caused us to lose sleep, get our blood pressure up, etc.  However, that alone does not necessarily mean a disability discrimination claim exists.  If that were the case, I think the courts would be even more overrun than they already are...

Majority Opinion Judge:  Judge Butz

Date:  May 26, 2015

Opinionhttps://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCEQFjAAahUKEwi5uMC12oXHAhUQD5IKHQm8D5k&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.courts.ca.gov%2Fopinions%2Fdocuments%2FC073677.PDF&ei=H5e7VfmsDZCeyASJ-L7ICQ&usg=AFQjCNFgg87XaAnwK_6FFOBGa6vNhtb_lg&sig2=aF0lEtRr0eoMMxytcK9eOA&bvm=bv.99261572,d.aWw

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations