Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


I came across a lot of good articles this week but was able to narrow down the list a bit.  One of the better articles that I read was about the lost revenue that employees and employers alike deal with as a result of a delay in employees filling out time sheets.  It is one of the more logical problems in the employment setting, but one that I do not stumble across very often.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


Employees Delayed in Filling Out Time Sheets? Say Goodbye to Lost Revenue.

We have all been there at one point or another, most likely:  your employer requires you to fill out a time sheet for your work.  Whether it be working in a factory, doing clerical work, or hourly billing at a law firm, recording time worked on a time sheet is vital to getting paid (not just for employees, but also for employers who bill others for the work done).  This article has a good insight into the tremendous amount of money lost from employees who delay in filling out time sheets.  Employers and employees alike, take notes, keep better track of hours worked or continue to see lost revenue.


With Obama's Push For Paid Sick Leave, Opposition Falls Into Place

A few weeks ago, I had mentioned that President Barack Obama was renewing a push for Congress to approve a bill that would provide up to seven days of paid sick leave for U.S. workers.  Unsurprisingly, Republicans and businesses have started to line up against that bill.  This is a good article from The Washington Post which breaks things down pretty well and gives a good overview of exactly what is going on now that President Obama has spoken out in support of paid sick leave.


Anonymous Workplace App - Employers Beware

Jon Hyman has a good article on an iPhone app, Memo, that allows individuals to post anonymous comments about their employers to a specific page about the company.  Apparently Memo has already gotten cease and desist letters and some companies have blocked Memo from their servers.  However, as Jon points out, there are major issues and liabilities that employers can face if they try and keep Memo out of the workplace.  It is a short article, but definitely worth a read.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per